What will be the last big title of this generation?

Carl

Currently Offline

141,690

31930 posts since 07/11/08

Recent Badges:

Freezing Logged in on Christmas day.
I Don't Seek Attention, It Seeks Me Received 100,000 profile views.
14 Years Has been a VGChartz member for over 14 years.
Making Friends 10 friends on gamrConnect.
1st Birthday Has been a VGChartz member for over 1 year.
Trust Me, It'll Have Legs 100 replies made to user's most popular thread.

Carl on 21 March 2010

CGI-Quality said:

Carl2291 said:

CGI-Quality said:

Carl2291 said:

Khuutra said:

Carl2291 said:

Khuutra said:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negative_proof#Argument_from_personal_incredulity

#Argument_from_personal_incredulity

Sony only published it in two territories, and it was only for one version. Why do you think Sony has more rights to it than a company that published a version all over the world? Or that they would have all rights to all versions (save one?) in perpetuity?

What is it with you and all the arguements? ¬_¬

Sony published it in 2 territories, yes. I know. For a console version. Eidos published it for a PC version. Now can you explain to me any other reason why FFVII hasn't appeared on XBL?

I am not wrong, and you are not wrong. It's just 2 possible arguements (of something never proven) of something that will likely not happen for YEARS. Why do you get so worked up over little things and drag them on... All the time?

Well it's not an Xbox original

So I'm going to guess it's the size limit on XBLA titles.

BAM

I know about the size limit, but it's been broken plenty of times. And seeing that FFVII sold over 100k on opening week... I'm highly surprised that they haven't put it on Live. I mean, they put Perfect Dark on Live, and it's from the same gen...

Perfect Dark is owned by Rare though.

Just as Final Fantasy VII is owned by SE. Are you telling me that they wouldn't want to be on the "best" online system this gen? Especially when they had/have Final Fantasy XIII on the 360.

No what I'm saying is, getting Perfect Dark made more sense as Micorosft owns the company that owns the property. FFVII was a PS1 classic. I guess Square didn't feel the need to venture out of the PlayStation platform for success. I'm also guessing that it's paid off as we've seen not even a mention of a 360 version of VII.

Also, maybe the publishing deal for VII interferes with that, as you say. And look at my edit in that last post.

Exactly. Which is my point. It can't be proven otherwise

GodOfWar_3ever

Currently Offline

52,791

4058 posts since 08/01/10

Recent Badges:

50 in One Add a total of 50 games to your collection.
14 Years Has been a VGChartz member for over 14 years.
Hit And Run 15 comments posted on VGChartz news articles.
Making Progress Earned 50,000 gamrPoints
Right Tool for the Right Tool Score a total of 25 games in your collection.
3 Years Has been a VGChartz member for over 3 years.

GodOfWar_3ever on 21 March 2010

darthdevidem01 said:
Isn't it obvious

Final Fantasy XV

The last FF of a gen ALWAYS comes out on the eve of a new consoles launch (FF9 & FF12 showed this).

On the PS2 I believe the ONLY BIG title after FF12 was GOW2....but even then FF12 was far bigger than GOW2 in terms of success.

God of War II was the perfect swan song for the PS2. And GoW II was the better game of the two anyway...soo.....

Sales =/= Quality