LurkerJ said:
We live in an era where voting is more powerful than protesting. You can get more done for you if you do your homework and organise and spread the message, protesting doesn't get you nearly the same results. But who wants homework, let's get out and blow the city up, that's always easier than educating ourselves about the candidates you're presented with and their history as politicians. In my opinion, Bernie failed (as a presidential candidate, not a politician), because people didn't do their homework, not that I am presenting him as the ideal candidate to elect, just an example of someone who would've pushed for real solutions if he was elected 10 years ago. So yeah, no sympathy for the lazy. |
To add to what others said, voting isn't perfect. If an issue only affects a minority of citizens, it may not only be difficult to get the majority to vote for a candidate who is on your side, but it may be difficult to get a candidate who even supports your cause. Protesting is a powerful tool for getting attention to a cause not just from other voters, but from politicians. Do you think all of the politicians making commitments to police reform are doing it just based on voting records? No, they are doing it because people demonstrated that this is a cause that will motivate them to support you if you take a stand.
Yes, people should organize around grassroots causes more, but public protest is very much a part of that.