thismeintiel said:
So, yes, if you fear for your life, you can shoot in self-defense, or if you fear for another's life. Your bullet and punch example falls flat when it is a fact that more people die from being hit physically than from being shot every year. You can survive a bullet depending on where you are hit, just like Jacob Blake survived getting shot several times when he refused to drop a knife. You can also die, or become severely brain damaged, from a single punch if you are hit hard enough and in the right spot. Same goes for being stabbed. So, no, what kind of weapon is used does not change the response. The law is if you fear for your life, period. Not if the person is holding a certain weapon or not. That's just a ridiculous standard, probably brought on by people watching actors "survive" those kinds of things in movies. Life isn't like the movies. You can die by getting hit ONCE by anything if its hard enough and in the right spot. |
@bolded. Do you recognize that there are many more people hit physically each year than getting shot? We don't base the risk to life of an action on how many people in total get killed from it each year. If that was the case driving a car is less risky than deep sea diving or tightrope walking. I mean so many more people die of driving I guess they're basically the same.
...