Nettles on 18 December 2020
JWeinCom said:
For the sake of argument, we'll assume the two situations were the same. I mean, they weren't, as the article shows, but that's besides the point. If that were the case, and the two situations were identical, then it was unacceptable in 1960 and it's unacceptable now. Simple as that. |
If it's constitutional it should be acceptable - although i will say 93% turnout for Hawaii seems really damn high.Maybe there was fishy business.
I haven't seen much King of The Hill, a few episodes here and there but i have watched Mike Judges movie Idiocracy and that seems to be where we are headed.
