Considering how "option" is clearly defined and is not contingent on one's chances of winning? Yes, you can. This principle you're suggesting can only lead to worse outcomes.
Plus, I just find it ironic to see anyone (here or elsewhere) display actual glee behind this decision when they're incredibly likely to use "anti-democratic" as a cudgel when gauging the morality of other political decisions. That's disregarded the moment it's inconvenient to you. It's like your candidate has a birthright to another's protest vote just because this is--once again--the most important presidential election of our lifetimes and I don't want to hear about 3rd parties.
See above. I'm not suggesting anything. Just mocking the broken electoral system.
Bet Shiken that COD would outsell Battlefield in 2018. http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8749702