By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
HylianSwordsman on 23 February 2020
Edit Thread
NightlyPoe said:
HylianSwordsman said:

It's not "based" on identity, it's just a coalition that you can measure off of such support. It will also have the support of unions, working class people, suburban and urban populations. However you want to word it. Me listing off the "identities" as you call them is just showing the breadth and depth of the coalition, not establishing a basis for it. They're demographic labels, not "identities" and the fact that you call them that shows us that YOU'RE the identity politician, not the Democrats.

Saying "I know you are, but what am I?" isn't exactly the most persuasive argument.

Re-read your own TED talk.  Every other sentence is about more Latino or black support in certain states.  I didn't say it, you did.  Furthermore, I was around during the Obama administration, it was the expressed plan of the Democrat party throughout that entire era.

Regardless, it remains fantasy that the whole country will follow only one party forever.  Especially, as you maintain, that it is a party led in a radical direction indefinitely.

Keep on projecting. Again, it's not identity, it's just a demographic description. And again, what are you doing in this thread if you think that the "expressed plan of the Democrat party" is that evil and crazy?