SpokenTruth said:
Holy hell man, that's exactly what he said. China is already a huge medical supplier for the US. But it's also not the only supplier. If China cuts supply, we get them from somewhere else. That doesn't change just because we move to a Medicare for All system. You said, "Imagine how much of a problem that would be now, and how much bigger of a problem it would be with free health care for all." Now I am asking you, how the hell does it become a bigger problem under Medicare For All? |
Tucker said Medicare for all means one medical goods supplier?
Free health care for all would certainly mean more people using and expecting medical services. Fast, reliable, service. How much worse would an interruption with the existing system be compared to a free for all system? How quickly could this situation occur, and how quickly could other suppliers fill the demand?
