KLAMarine said:
the-pi-guy said:
-universal background checks
-programs to help mental illness
-programs to deal with extremist propaganda
There, 3 things that can be done without even banning a single gun.
|
All three sound perfectly reasonable. The devil is in the details.
Well if I was defending myself against someone else with a gun, I'm going to want as much in my favor as possible. If someone comes at me with a semi-automatic, I don't want to be stuck with a normal hand gun. I'd go for what gives me the greatest chance of success/survival and that would mean the most power money can offer.
konnichiwa said:
Well their are cases that are overblown, you can literally have at the same time a police officer shooting a black guy and killing him and a police officer shooting a white guy and also killing him. The first police officer will be called racist and we get a rise in 'black lives matter' while we will not see the same effect with the white 'victim'.
but in the case of texas everything points to a man who seemed to be a white nationalist who wanted to kill and shoot non whites, if all the points are confirmed you can only speak about a white nationlist terrorist attack. The fear of white domestic grown up supremacists terrorists is growing.
The second shootings seems clear to a non terrorist attack because he wasn't aiming at a certain group of people but rather a place so the colour of the shooter doesn't seems to matter.
|
Do we know why the Texas shooting occurred? Is there a manifesto somewhere?
|
That's why I said 'if all the points are confirmed'
The suspect is believed to be the author of a text posted on 8chan, an online message board frequently used by the far right, which describes a "cultural and ethnic replacement brought on by an invasion", alluding to Hispanic people in the US.
The four-page document, reportedly posted some 20 minutes before police received the first emergency call, also expresses support for the gunman who killed 51 people in Christchurch, New Zealand, in March.