| Clyde32 said: Buddy bump, not chartz bump. I didn't catch all the marth references(I guess I wasn't paying attention). I also think the posts he was talking about are wrong in some places. It will only bug me because he didn't link to them, so I can't see what they actually said. Other than that it was just a regular analysis. |
My apologies. I was trying to keep it focused on Khan, not Astro. I think these are the parts you're referring to.
Astro throws out the idea that Mr. Saturn could be one of the roles here, Radish points out how silly this is here
Astro makes his non-playable characters could be in the game argument starting here, though this one I linked later in the post, the "This one" link. It's closer to the end of the post. I call him out on a number of things here, including regarding his non-playable characters are possible argument and his good guys might be bad argument. He responds here that he played a game where Marth was scum (interesting that Khan stops with the Marth flavor after Astro's statements) but admits it was specifically about Melee tiers so there was a reason to suspect Marth specifically, and that because Captain Falcon is missing that means our characters might not all be in the Smash roster. I call him out on this here that we've no reason as of yet to believe it isn't a standard villains vs. heroes game, and that with 50 characters to choose from Captain Falcon's absence means nothing. In the next post he doesn't flat out say he gives up the non-playable character argument, but he just says it feels off to him, so I took it as him conceding the point and trying to rationalize why he made the point in the first place. That post is here. Yoshiya tries to convince me that Astro's arguments about town-sounding characters being potentially scum might be worth considering here, but agrees that the characters should all come from the roster of one of the games. Then I compromise that maybe neutral characters could be scum here.
Moving on,
"Astro says I'm active, but he thinks I'm scum, his gut feeling. Only grounds he has are that I told Nickles not to be overconfident, which he twists into me "targeting" Nickles, and that I targeted him when he became active with what he now admits is bad play." Astro's accusation here, and my warning to Nickles that Astro twisted into an attack is here.
I think that's everything. Sorry to hear you just think it's a "regular analysis". Do you seriously have no opinion on Astro or Khan?
