Nicklesbe said:
TheDrill said:
DonFerrari said:
TheDrill said:
Aura7541 said:
TheDrill said:
Arkaign said:
We're due for vgc to fix their method of approximating their xb1 numbers going forward. Overdue in fact considering the massive failure in accuracy. What will people do with no more broken numbers to pin their hopes on? :) |
people are blowing out of proportion the inaccuracy of VGchartz.
Their numbers are respectable.
|
Constantly overtracking the X1 and undertracking the PS4 are hardly respectable. Overtracking the X1 in April by almost 100% is egregious.
You really need to get your head out of the sand and start facing the facts. Your console of preference is struggling and even in its strongest market, it is getting significantly outsold by its competitor.
|
11 % is not significant.
|
You are the only one believing in this 11% and that is your assumed difference not accuracy. We have gave you various stances of discrepancies. But you prove vgc is accurate because their number "seems rigth" but don't have any proof.
Don't take it personally but you seem like your nick, you keep spinning the same point over and over even though proved wrong. In yours master degree when your mentor corrected you what have you done? Kept refusing to accept?
|
I can refuse to accept your numbers simply from your lack of proper english, it's enough proof for me.
Also I wasn't present any proof, just a claim that NPD numbers are better
|
With that logic your own terrible english is enough to write off your claims as nonsense. Also you were "presented" pleanty of proof. Or is the the fact the entire game industry trusts those numbers, Xbox came out and said the numbers were accurate, and it was proved that VGC goes back to change their numbers to reflect NPD not enough proof for you?
|
*plenty
Microsoft never made any announcement confirming the numbers, people come to the wrong conclusions because the xbox site quoted the arcticle.
