kjj4t9rdad on 23 March 2009
| mesoteto said: @kjj---your seriously going to try and say the GBA is just a watered down version of teh DS.......riiiiiiighttt and as far as pushing hardware....the GC was just a little better then the 64....righttttttttt....... and the snes was just little better then the nes...........rrrrrriiiiiighhhhtttt...... but what do i know i am just a 5 year old right? |
No, what I said was the Ds is a watered down version of the Dsi and the GB is a watered down version of the GBcolor which is a water down version of the GBA.
The gap between the nes and snes is not very big. They did make the GC alot better than the 64 but still got thier ass handed to them.
The snes was 2x's the power of the nes - 8 bit to 16 bit
the GC was 7.76x's more powerful than the 64 - 62.5 mHz to 485 mHz
the Wii is 1.5x's more powerful than the GC - 485 mHz to 729 mHz
The PS2 is 8.8x's more powerful than the ps1 - 33.87 mHz to 299 mHz
The PS3 is 10.7x's more powerful thand the ps2 - 299 mHz to 3.2 gHz
