You continue being dishonest. I never said there was no loading. I said there was barely any. From a player point of view, as I explained in later comments, they’re non-issues because they handled them in such a way that the game doesn’t feel much different from the earlier titles in the series.

Now, please continue trying to tell me what I know or not. I find it pathetic but amusing at the same time. 

Because, if you continue spinning it this way, then you will have to say that the N64 games had loading because, hey, that’s the nature of computer hardware. But that is clearly not what I was pointing out in my first comment.  

I know it isn't Ideal. That is one reason I don't review or evaluate Zelda, because I know it is a great game that I wouldn't do justice when evaluating. Thus I prefer to honestly say I prefer one because I don't care much about the other, there may be one time when I'll try to play it though =p.

Perhaps during the transition to PS5 I'll have low backlog and may try zelda.

Yeeeeah, that's the thing. People assume me being critical of OOT is a show that I hate it or something. I don't, it's still, even for me, a 7.5 or 8.0 out of ten, it is still a GOOD game, but I just don't think it's held up at all and even then I thought it was a little underwhelming. yeah, it did have to compete with the limitations of the technology at the time and compared to its contemporaries it did really well...but like its contemporaries it really didn't age well. at all. I can't go back and play OOT anymore, it's just slow and janky and frustrating. if I look at it from a lens of 1998, sure it's impressive. But it was woefully outclassed by Wind Waker just a few years later. 

you know, the Zelda a vocal group people hated for being toony, even though that game holds up as well as Link to the Past. 

Some hard facts on the back of the box art.

Those are opinions. Except for the 3 CD rom part.  That part is a fact.

Grab a chair and sit down. Those are professional opinions. Hard Facts.

You just referred to the statements as opinion and fact in the same sentence.  I'm sorry, those are mutually exclusive categories.  It can be one or another. Not both.

Because someone is paid to give an opinion does not somehow make it a fact as professionals can come to different conclusions.  

I referred to the box art because it in fact made those statements. That's hard for you to understand?

Grab a chair and sit down. Those are professional opinions. Hard Facts.

"Those are opininons" That's what you call a conversation killer. Not going to get into another dumb argument with you, so I would say "Respect those opinions."