By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Microsoft Discussion - Killzone 2 graphics comes to the 360 and it's called Brink

Baroque_Dude on 01 December 2009
De85 said:
libellule said:
Baroque_Dude said:
newbie3 said:

http://g4tv.com/videos/43026/Exclusive-Brink-An-Objective-Perspective-Container-City-Pt1/?quality=hd

 

The debate about whether KZ2 is possible on 360 just ended imo. You can argue maybe that in some ways KZ2 looks a little better ( then again, it had a MUCH higher development budget) but unless you're just a fanboy imo, you cant argue that Brink isn't coming very close.

1. It doesn't seem like Brink will look as good (and detailed) as Killzone 2 graphics, in my opinion. Very nice graphics, though.

2. If a game has good graphics in the XBox 360, it's because is more powerful than the PS3, but if a PS3 game has good graphics then it's not because of the power of the PS3, it's just that the developers had a bigger budget... ¬_¬ Did some of you, guys, noticed this kind of frequent phenomenon?


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Damage_control_(news)#Spin

;)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irony

And also this.



"I think that I don't think."

- Soli Deo Gloria -

The FUTURE is the FUTURE. Now... B_E_L_I_E_V_E!

Around the Network
Nina5639 on 01 December 2009

THIS GAME IS NOT XBOX 360 EXCLUSIVE IT IS ALSO COMING TO THE PS3.



Fufinu on 01 December 2009

Whether the game is exclusive is irrelevant to the argument. At the same time, this does not even come close to the visuals in KZ2 in terms of lighting, textures, animations, character details and faces.



coolestguyever on 01 December 2009

That looked like a cartoon game. The characters looked more animated then real and the textures were so bad. I thought it looked more like Borderlands then Killzone.

Oh and someone said its on PS3 as well so this is all kind of irrelevant if its multiplat.



ZenfoldorVGI on 01 December 2009

Looks about KZ2 level. I like the artstyle. Looks more colorful, which is good.



I don't need your console war.
It feeds the rich while it buries the poor.
You're power hungry, spinnin' stories, and bein' graphics whores.
I don't need your console war.

NO NO, NO NO NO.

Around the Network
richardhutnik on 01 December 2009
newbie3 said:

http://g4tv.com/videos/43026/Exclusive-Brink-An-Objective-Perspective-Container-City-Pt1/?quality=hd

 

The debate about whether KZ2 is possible on 360 just ended imo. You can argue maybe that in some ways KZ2 looks a little better ( then again, it had a MUCH higher development budget) but unless you're just a fanboy imo, you cant argue that Brink isn't coming very close.

 

YT link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F6RqVpp-ZJI

Looks good, but not sure how you can compare the two games.  KZ2 had bots, and also rendered a very windy and dusty wasteland of a planet.  The world of Brink is a different animal, and Brink looks like it has far more of an RPG element to it.  Brink is also likely far more open-ended, and has to render more environments.  End result will be the lighting effects are better on KZ2, along with more wind and particle effects.  If your mention of KZ2 was to have it as the supposed top benchmark for console FPS titles specs, then I would suggest maybe you forget that, and go with asking how any game holds up to Crysis instead on consoles.



richardhutnik on 01 December 2009
newbie3 said:
LOL, well, we see all the fans of a certain system (not Xbox) that hang out in the Xbox forums all day rushing to this post, eh?

The game looks better than Killzone 2, easily, period. Not debatable. We know EVERYBODY saying different in this thread, is a PS3 homer. I can click any one of their profiles, look at their post histories, and I GUARANTEE what I will find, they are all Ps3 fans (those that dont only have PS3 on their system list even). Credibility, gone.

YT link:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F6RqVpp-ZJI

It does NOT look better than KZ2. And go ahead and say I am a PS3 homer.  I DARE you.  Brink looks good, but I dare anyone to objectively compare the two, because Brink is doing different things and rendering a different world.



makingmusic476 on 02 December 2009
newbie3 said:
LOL, well, we see all the fans of a certain system (not Xbox) that hang out in the Xbox forums all day rushing to this post, eh?

The game looks better than Killzone 2, easily, period. Not debatable. We know EVERYBODY saying different in this thread, is a PS3 homer. I can click any one of their profiles, look at their post histories, and I GUARANTEE what I will find, they are all Ps3 fans (those that dont only have PS3 on their system list even). Credibility, gone.

YT link:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F6RqVpp-ZJI

1. You state a rather controversly opinion that most people will disagree with.

2. You start insulting those that disagree with you.

Yup, this is a bait thread.



radiantshadow92 on 02 December 2009

the game is extremely nice and fluid, i would say it beats killzone in the graphics department because even though killzone looks better, its very glitchy, however this game looks very fluid and i look foward to it ^_^



theprof00 on 02 December 2009

I've been a fan of this game for a while. I even posted all the pics of it in the games library for the ps3 version.
While I think it looks cool and really great on it's own level, it's just a bit shy of matching up to kz2.
For one, the art style is different. It's slightly cartoony, and there are some hard edges on some of the textures. It's still under development, so it has a while to iron out all the edges, but from what I've seen so far, it's a bit less than equal.