By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - MW2 online is inferior to KZ2 online without a doubt

Thank you very much spartan. I played MW2 on 360 and have since returned to dear old KZ. The games just dont compare at all.

KZ2 just has a LOT more action than mw2. Geez, was cod4 like this? It must be the size of the maps. It's tough playing max 18 ppl in MW2 after playing 32 player slugfests on radec in kz2.



"Dr. Tenma, according to you, lives are equal. That's why I live today. But you must have realised it by now...the only thing people are equal in is death"---Johann Liebert (MONSTER)

"WAR is a racket. It always has been.

It is possibly the oldest, easily the most profitable, surely the most vicious. It is the only one international in scope. It is the only one in which the profits are reckoned in dollars and the losses in lives"---Maj. Gen. Smedley Butler

Around the Network
S.T.A.G.E. said:
XxXProphecyXxX said:
WoW at the 360 fanbois downplaying KZ2...go buy a ps3 and KZ2 first then maybe just maybe ppl will take you seriously.

Being that the 360 has the larger variety of FPS games and better FPS titles, I would take heed his opinion. Not to mention the 360 controller is just way better for shooting.

what FPS on 360 Is better than KZ2? More =/=better. I do agree that the 360 controller is better for shooting but it can't be used to play kz2 unfortunately. 35 days in and nothing can draw me away from teh killzone. 



"Dr. Tenma, according to you, lives are equal. That's why I live today. But you must have realised it by now...the only thing people are equal in is death"---Johann Liebert (MONSTER)

"WAR is a racket. It always has been.

It is possibly the oldest, easily the most profitable, surely the most vicious. It is the only one international in scope. It is the only one in which the profits are reckoned in dollars and the losses in lives"---Maj. Gen. Smedley Butler

It's the number of players that lets Modern Warfare 2 down. Maximum 8 players for free-for-all is just pathetic. If it had 32 like Killzone I wouldn't hesitate to say it had the best online mutliplayer in an FPS ever.

As is it now, its better than KZ2 but not as fun as CoD4.



MW2 wipes the floor with KZ2, Go look at the reviews then go and play both online for a week, then come back and tell me which is best......



FKNetwork said:
MW2 wipes the floor with KZ2, Go look at the reviews then go and play both online for a week, then come back and tell me which is best......

No shit homie. MW2 scored a minute fraction over kz2 in reviews if those actually matter to anyone and my assessment is from someone who has15 days of cod4 online, 35 days of kz2 online and about 5 hours of MW2 online on 360 which is supposedly even better. I returned to kz2 and there are lots of people like me. Another guy in our clan said he returned MW2 same day after playing online and just stayed with kz2 so don't spout ignorant BS. Most people who have explored kz2 online in depth would probably stick with it. I know that the online community doesn't seem to have changed much since mw2 launched. Many predicted that kz2 will die on mw2 launch on kz forums. They're all eating crow.

 

Other players may leave cos playing the same thing online for months gets boring after a while. This doesn't necessarily make mw2 better. It would only be better if it can hold these kind s of players longer than kz2 did. MW2 is the new "must buy" game for everyone now. We'll know what people really think in a few months.



"Dr. Tenma, according to you, lives are equal. That's why I live today. But you must have realised it by now...the only thing people are equal in is death"---Johann Liebert (MONSTER)

"WAR is a racket. It always has been.

It is possibly the oldest, easily the most profitable, surely the most vicious. It is the only one international in scope. It is the only one in which the profits are reckoned in dollars and the losses in lives"---Maj. Gen. Smedley Butler

Around the Network

If the multiplayers anything like modern warfare 1, I agree that killzone 2's multiplayer is better.



Check out my game about moles ^

OurGunzNeverTire said:
killzone 2 destroys MW2, they shouldn't even be in the same conversation. But that is all opinion, it is more of a personal preference really seeing as they provide 2 totally different experiences.

mw2 is a low tech, last gen, arcade shooter, with super easy controls, every weapons is the same, its fast paced, and highly noob friendly. requires no skill, no teamwork, no tactics, no strategy, is not a battlefield, but more than anything it provides instant gratification for kills, but off all that, MW2 never wanted to be any of those things so you can't knock it.

killzone2 on the other hand, requires a massive amount of skill, a massive amount of dedication,
requires massive amounts of teamwork, strategy, tactics, and is not noob friendly at all. it's also unforgiving, steep learning curve. matches force you to think for more than 8 minutes, and for more than 1 game mode. the battles are way more intense (when skilled players are playing) and is class based. killzone2 is for the higher level gamer looking for a deeper experience, the clan support is were killzone2 really shines.

so really it is all about preference. what do you want.......
noob friendly, arcade shooter, that provides instant high level of gratification for killing.
or
intense, full fledged battles, that requires skill, teamwork, tactics, and strategy, forces you to think or be destroyed, and requires a great amount of dedication to feel gratification.

.................. -goes back to playing bad company 2 beta, "someone take out that tank"-......................

This guy knows whats up. MW2 doesn't even have a clan system. Clan games are almost akin to sports competitions in kz2.



"Dr. Tenma, according to you, lives are equal. That's why I live today. But you must have realised it by now...the only thing people are equal in is death"---Johann Liebert (MONSTER)

"WAR is a racket. It always has been.

It is possibly the oldest, easily the most profitable, surely the most vicious. It is the only one international in scope. It is the only one in which the profits are reckoned in dollars and the losses in lives"---Maj. Gen. Smedley Butler

i think both are way to similar , i like killzone 2's maps better but other wise im really loving MW2's online , cant Say it wont be long Before im right back on killzone 2 tho..



Atto Suggests...:

Book - Malazan Book of the Fallen series 

Game - Metro Last Light

TV - Deadwood

Music - Forest Swords 

OurGunzNeverTire said:
killzone 2 destroys MW2, they shouldn't even be in the same conversation. But that is all opinion, it is more of a personal preference really seeing as they provide 2 totally different experiences.

mw2 is a low tech, last gen, arcade shooter, with super easy controls, every weapons is the same, its fast paced, and highly noob friendly. requires no skill, no teamwork, no tactics, no strategy, is not a battlefield, but more than anything it provides instant gratification for kills, but off all that, MW2 never wanted to be any of those things so you can't knock it.

killzone2 on the other hand, requires a massive amount of skill, a massive amount of dedication,
requires massive amounts of teamwork, strategy, tactics, and is not noob friendly at all. it's also unforgiving, steep learning curve. matches force you to think for more than 8 minutes, and for more than 1 game mode. the battles are way more intense (when skilled players are playing) and is class based. killzone2 is for the higher level gamer looking for a deeper experience, the clan support is were killzone2 really shines.

so really it is all about preference. what do you want.......
noob friendly, arcade shooter, that provides instant high level of gratification for killing.
or
intense, full fledged battles, that requires skill, teamwork, tactics, and strategy, forces you to think or be destroyed, and requires a great amount of dedication to feel gratification.

.................. -goes back to playing bad company 2 beta, "someone take out that tank"-......................

It sounds like you haven't played anything but a round or two of Team Deathmatch. Try playing Headquarters, Demolition, Domination, CTF, Search and Destroy or the Hardcore playlists and then try to say it takes no skill or teamwork to win. That's the beauty of MW 1 & 2 anybody can play and get kills, but it takes skill and very quick reflexes as well as a brain to set up your weapons to be really good.

 

How can you say that all the weapons are the same when even the Sniper Rifles, SMGs and ARs are completely different from one another? Not to mention the variety of shotguns and pistols. Some ARs shoot bursts others are full auto and some are single shot, with different damage, distance and accuracy properties even between similar guns. It sounds like you never even unlocked the early guns.

Killzone 2 is a huge clusterfuck of people dying left and right. It takes more "skill" because the controls are horrid and the game is slow as hell. I like that it tries to be different, but that isn't always a good thing.

I'm not going to shit too much on Killzone 2, I really just don't like the game and outside of the internet I don't know anyone that does. Even the PS3 fanboys that I know don't care for it. The only thing it has going for it is graphics and that alone. From what I remember it was a huge mess of people crowding up in corriders, grenades and explosives giving you tons of free kills (because of the clusterfucks) and entire teams using and abusing classes to the point of nearly breaking the game.

This game was hyped to the moon by everybody, but when it came down to it the game just didn't measure up to the truly great FPS shooters out there.



@PearlJam


lol, you forgot this.