By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - IGN AU gives AC 2 - 9.0 for 360, 8.8 for PS3 (360 = DEFINITIVE console ver)

huaxiong90 on 17 November 2009
XxXProphecyXxX said:
WOW.....I just dont get how can devs who developed a game on the ps3 for the first time such as Bioware can produce a better ps3 version of their game yet devs like Ubisoft who have more experience with PS3 cant even get ps3 version at least on par wity the others.

To be fair, the framerate of the PS3 version did suffer a bit in DA:O. But then again, the poor texture quality on the 360 version could have helped its framerate.



Rockstar: Announce Bully 2 already and make gamers proud!

Kojima: Come out with Project S already!

Around the Network
BMaker11 on 17 November 2009
XxXProphecyXxX said:
WOW.....I just dont get how can devs who developed a game on the ps3 for the first time such as Bioware can produce a better ps3 version of their game yet devs like Ubisoft who have more experience with PS3 cant even get ps3 version at least on par wity the others.

Word...



jedians on 17 November 2009
darthdevidem01 said:
@smoked hostage

Most peole know what AC2 is....I couldn't be talking about Animal Crossing 2 (do you think I'd make a thread about animal crossing ROFL ROFL ROFL) or Ace combat 2 cus ace combat 6 is out!!!


lol



cura on 17 November 2009

If I had a 360...I'd definitely be getting that version (provided I got used to the controller).

I wonder how the pc version will hold?



ocnkng on 17 November 2009
Homeroids said:
Still, that's gotta be disappointing for Sony, especially when you consider the promotional effort they did for this game way back from E3. Personally, I'd be really pissed of with Ubisoft, if I was Sony. :)

Yes. Especially when Sony is shouldering some of the burden of publicising this game.



 

It is better to die on one's feet

then live on one's knees

Around the Network
Mirson on 17 November 2009

360 version it is.



wholikeswood on 17 November 2009

None of the other major 30 reviewers of the game so far have kicked up a big fuss about differences...

And I've never heard of any update fixing screen-tearing. :O



darthdevidem01 on 17 November 2009
XxXProphecyXxX said:
WOW.....I just dont get how can devs who developed a game on the ps3 for the first time such as Bioware can produce a better ps3 version of their game yet devs like Ubisoft who have more experience with PS3 cant even get ps3 version at least on par wity the others.

Well to put it simply, Bioware is an effing awesome developer

they are one of the best in the industry, if they couldn't do that then "who could"



All hail the KING, Andrespetmonkey

De85 on 17 November 2009
V-r0cK said:
Well i was expecting both HD console reviews to be the same just copy/paste. But if one were to be higher than the other of course the 360 is expected to be higher since the PS3 version was the port.

Does 0.2 point difference really consider as a large gap? The Orange Box reviews had a larger gap.

Really?  I thought that the first one started life as a PS3 exclusive until sony didn't buy them off.  Would they really do a 180 like that and lead on 360 for the sequel?



Gh0st4lifE on 17 November 2009
CommonMan said:
hsrob said:

2%, that's huge! I don't know how any self respecting PS3 fan could buy that version of the game now :P

No problem for me, I haven't respected myself in years.

 

 

ROFL !



God i hate fanboys, almost as much as they hate facts

 

“If you want to build a ship, don't drum up people together to collect wood and don't assign them tasks and work, but rather teach them to long for the endless immensity of the sea” Antoine de St-Exupery

  +2Q  /  -2N  (to be read in french)