I cant believe they could give a sub 5 hour game a 9.5
That is so far below an acceptable length for me that im no longer getting this. I was starting to get hyped, but now ill hire it and be done with it in a day.

10 for graphics?

Hahahahaha.

Omg.

Apparently he composed the score for the game.

http://content.usatoday.com/communities/gamehunters/post/2009/11/qa-with-modern-warfare-2-composer-hans-zimmer/1

It's a sign of the change of times in gaming.

Online and multiplayer in some case are far more important than the offline single player.
This games multiplayer is so huge it's its biggest feature.

You'll have to play it on its hardest difficulty and hunt those achievements to drag out the single player.

Got this today.

I have to agree that the campaign isn't as good as CoD4. Still fantastic, but the beginning until the 3rd mission or so of the 2nd act is a bit under CoD standards. The rest is awesome though.

Oh well the 10 in graphics is ridiculous. Console version doesn't deserve it and neither the PC version.

Campaign is ~5 hours (depends on the difficult settings)

Even if you don't include the heart of the game (multiplayer) there is still the special ops mode, which can be played multi and singleplayer. So it's definitely much longer than 5 hours.

Agree, the Terminal mission, i was like Omg how.

Well deserved score from IGN again.

Giving the game a 10 for its visuals is rubbish.

Graphics should be somewhere between 9.1 - 9.3.