By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo Discussion - Time for Modern Warfare-Reflex multiplayer videos!

That's why I hate 9v9 MP, you run for 10 mn without encountering any opponents, then die/frag, respawn run 10 mn... not for me.



Around the Network
LordTheNightKnight said:
Sorcery said:

I wonder if Activision expected a positive internet response like this.


Honestly, MWR looks fantastic, identical in every way to the original, with a downgrade in graphics. The fact that it's 30 FPS instead of 60 isn't that big of a deal, so long as it stays at a constant 30 FPS and doesn't dip very often. It's a shame that this type of game is coming 3 years after launch.

 

I won't go so far as to say it looks better than the Conduit though, the Conduit looks like an early 360 game to me, honestly.

Weren't the HD games 30fps?

60 fps. It's the only thing that slightly worries me about the game, but not too much. It's probably not something that a first timer would notice, but I might feel a bit different playing the game.



Tag: Became a freaking mod and a complete douche, coincidentally, at the same time.



Killy_Vorkosigan said:
That's why I hate 9v9 MP, you run for 10 mn without encountering any opponents, then die/frag, respawn run 10 mn... not for me.

That match wasn't necessarily 9v9. It could have been as low as 3v3. In fact, considering how few people are probably able to play right now since the game isn't out yet, it's likely hard to find players online.



Tag: Became a freaking mod and a complete douche, coincidentally, at the same time.



Onyxmeth said:
LordTheNightKnight said:
Sorcery said:

I wonder if Activision expected a positive internet response like this.


Honestly, MWR looks fantastic, identical in every way to the original, with a downgrade in graphics. The fact that it's 30 FPS instead of 60 isn't that big of a deal, so long as it stays at a constant 30 FPS and doesn't dip very often. It's a shame that this type of game is coming 3 years after launch.

 

I won't go so far as to say it looks better than the Conduit though, the Conduit looks like an early 360 game to me, honestly.

Weren't the HD games 30fps?

60 fps. It's the only thing that slightly worries me about the game, but not too much. It's probably not something that a first timer would notice, but I might feel a bit different playing the game.

Honestly the framerate was a little worse in W@W on Wii but still looked good and played well I can't imagine this playing worse to be honest.



MaxwellGT2000 - "Does the amount of times you beat it count towards how hardcore you are?"

Wii Friend Code - 5882 9717 7391 0918 (PM me if you add me), PSN - MaxwellGT2000, XBL - BlkKniteCecil, MaxwellGT2000

umh the guy in the first vid runs arround alone and in the second he gets killed every 2 secs...

This game looks pretty empty of players :/ (probably wasn't more than 8 on the map) what's the max player announced?

(i'd be hyped... if I didn't feel like this should have released a while ago).



OoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoO

Around the Network
MaxwellGT2000 said:
Onyxmeth said:

60 fps. It's the only thing that slightly worries me about the game, but not too much. It's probably not something that a first timer would notice, but I might feel a bit different playing the game.

Honestly the framerate was a little worse in W@W on Wii but still looked good and played well I can't imagine this playing worse to be honest.

Right. That's what I was saying. Wii only owners wouldn't know the difference. I might notice a slight difference coming from the 360 version to the Wii version. I've always been able to feel the added fluidity of the gameplay compared to other shooters. Don't think this is a deal breaker for me though. I'm just saying I might notice a slight difference is all.



Tag: Became a freaking mod and a complete douche, coincidentally, at the same time.



Onyxmeth said:
MaxwellGT2000 said:
Onyxmeth said:
 

60 fps. It's the only thing that slightly worries me about the game, but not too much. It's probably not something that a first timer would notice, but I might feel a bit different playing the game.

Honestly the framerate was a little worse in W@W on Wii but still looked good and played well I can't imagine this playing worse to be honest.

Right. That's what I was saying. Wii only owners wouldn't know the difference. I might notice a slight difference coming from the 360 version to the Wii version. I've always been able to feel the added fluidity of the gameplay compared to other shooters. Don't think this is a deal breaker for me though. I'm just saying I might notice a slight difference is all.

Well I have the PC version and will be playing the Wii version, honestly if I compared W@W Wii and CoD4 PC the Wii game is very accurate and fast visually not as fluid but gameplay it's hard for me to choose honestly the 60 frames don't help me much more than analog movement (vs WASD) does for the Wii. 



MaxwellGT2000 - "Does the amount of times you beat it count towards how hardcore you are?"

Wii Friend Code - 5882 9717 7391 0918 (PM me if you add me), PSN - MaxwellGT2000, XBL - BlkKniteCecil, MaxwellGT2000

great MW Reflex Disguise Hisiru, Activision will never find it Mwahahaha

wait a minute didnt i say the same thing in the youtube box? lol



i got the ps3 version but im getting this for sure, this looks sexy lol



This looks good. Also good news for the Wii owners. Its a must buy

Not for me though, I am getting MW2