By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony Discussion - First Ratchet: ACIT review

I still think the last R&C game on PS3 is one of the best looking games I've ever seen on a console. All I want is more platforming from this one and it seems the Clank segments have those.



Thanks to Blacksaber for the sig!

Around the Network

no your not leo-j

METACRITIC does determine this & has for most posters on internet forums around the net

If it hadn;t why do Metacritic threads get 100 + posts on Vg chartz, as much as people like to ROFL at metacritic, they use it too & its actually a VERY GOOD indication.



All hail the KING, Andrespetmonkey

Blood_Tears said:
Cryoakira said:
leo-j said:
METACRITIC DETERMINES if its AAA OR NOT


So, Braid is a AAA title ?

Please, if you ignore the sense of AAA "title", just don't use it.


Actually yes, Braid is a AAA title.


Actually, no, it's not. As several ppl told you before, "AAA" is a matter of production values; budget being probalby one of the most obvious point. The AAA is a term used by publishers/developpers well before the public even know about the existence of the game.

Believe it or not, but games like Uncharted (Meta : 88), Resident Evil 5 (86) or CoD WaW (85) were all AAA games, while Flower (87) don't.

 



darthdevidem01 said:
no your not leo-j

METACRITIC does determine this & has for most posters on internet forums around the net

If it hadn;t why do Metacritic threads get 100 + posts on Vg chartz, as much as people like to ROFL at metacritic, they use it too & its actually a VERY GOOD indication.

maybe ir ur a newb to gaming...if uve been gaming for at at least 3 years, u should kno wat like and u dont like and shouldn't need a collective opinion from other ppl to decide whether or not u should play a game....why do i need meta to tell me to play MGS4???? if im a fan it shouldn't matter wat meta thinks

No, Braid isn't an AAA title, a game with production values like it can't be an AAA title, since AAA stands for the production values.

How come pepole don't realise that the only thinkg AAA stands for is the production value? Assassin's Creed is an AAA game, and a very bad one, Braid isn't an AAA game, yet it is still a very good one.



Bet with Dr.A.Peter.Nintendo that Super Mario Galaxy 2 won't sell 15 million copies up to six months after it's release, the winner will get Avatar control for a week and signature control for a month.

Around the Network
non-gravity said:
darthdevidem01 said:
R&C is a must buy!

It doesn't matter if its AAA or a ZZZ title I will still buy it!

trust me you do not want a ZZZ title

 

why?



All hail the KING, Andrespetmonkey

On vgchartz, AAA means a good game.



Xxain said:
darthdevidem01 said:
no your not leo-j

METACRITIC does determine this & has for most posters on internet forums around the net

If it hadn;t why do Metacritic threads get 100 + posts on Vg chartz, as much as people like to ROFL at metacritic, they use it too & its actually a VERY GOOD indication.

maybe ir ur a newb to gaming...if uve been gaming for at at least 3 years, u should kno wat like and u dont like and shouldn't need a collective opinion from other ppl to decide whether or not u should play a game....why do i need meta to tell me to play MGS4???? if im a fan it shouldn't matter wat meta thinks

Thats besides the point

I even said in my first post in the thread

for a game like R&C I don't care what it gets but FOR MANY GAMES...especially less hyped DS ones, dragon Age Origins & lower hyped games, metacritic matters to me, it gives me a rough guide of the games quality.



All hail the KING, Andrespetmonkey

MetalGearSolid_4ever said:
I added all of Uncharted 2's scores and divded it by the number of reviews and it comes down to 94 point something ? how does it say 97 ?
OT - R&C ACIT looks better than tod.


You messed up somewhere. I just did it and got an average of 96.6829268292682926829268293




PS3 Trophies

 

 

darthdevidem01 said:
Xxain said:
darthdevidem01 said:
no your not leo-j

METACRITIC does determine this & has for most posters on internet forums around the net

If it hadn;t why do Metacritic threads get 100 + posts on Vg chartz, as much as people like to ROFL at metacritic, they use it too & its actually a VERY GOOD indication.

maybe ir ur a newb to gaming...if uve been gaming for at at least 3 years, u should kno wat like and u dont like and shouldn't need a collective opinion from other ppl to decide whether or not u should play a game....why do i need meta to tell me to play MGS4???? if im a fan it shouldn't matter wat meta thinks

Thats besides the point

I even said in my first post in the thread

for a game like R&C I don't care what it gets but FOR MANY GAMES...especially less hyped DS ones, dragon Age Origins & lower hyped games, metacritic matters to me, it gives me a rough guide of the games quality.


but its exactly the point - we should NOT be relying on reviews, Meta, and definitely hype to choose are games or judge whether a game is AAA( which again only means production values) AAA to one is NOT AAA to another...we have our own taste ands the only thing we should be using.