Jereel Hunter said:
thekitchensink said: If they didn't want to spend the few billion it would have taken to buy Take-Two a couple years back, there's no way EA is in their price range. |
You may not be acquainted with buying things, but not thinking something is worth the money doesn't mean you'll never make a larger purchase. "I don't want to spend $35 on dinner, so clearly I will never buy a new suit." Take-Two is badly mismanaged and constantly in financial trouble. EA may be more expensive, but there's a much larger upside.
|
Um... wow. They are both major gaming companies, so they are in the same category. Dinner and a suit are completely different categories. If Microsoft really wanted Take-Two, and the problem was their management, they would have bought them and fixed the management. So that's a completely moot point.
Now, Electronic Arts would be exponentially more expensive to buy than Take-Two--they even submitted their own bid for Take-Two when all this was going on. So the odds of Microsoft buying them when they didn't buy Take-Two are very, very slim.
As an aside, there are ways to make your point without sounding offensive. You should learn them.
Could I trouble you for some maple syrup to go with the plate of roffles you just served up?
Tag, courtesy of fkusumot: "Why do most of the PS3 fanboys have avatars that looks totally pissed?"
"Ok, girl's trapped in the elevator, and the power's off. I swear, if a zombie comes around the next corner..."