By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Microsoft Discussion - Here is why PS3 games have higher accumulated review average than 360 games

http://www.gamerankings.com/browse.html?site=ps3&cat=0&year=0&numrev=0&sort=1&letter=&search=



 

 

Around the Network
MontanaHatchet said:
http://www.gamerankings.com/browse.html?site=ps3&cat=0&year=0&numrev=0&sort=1&letter=&search=

i think it's more important that a console has more good games than have less bad ones.



 

 

 

 

disolitude said:
deathbleachnarutodbz said:
maybe people just make better games for the ps3.

I don't want to get in to the details on how it costs more money to make a PS3 game...and that generally it has lower game sales than 360 due to lower userbase (with exceptions ofcourse)...and that its much more complex to develo for PS3, which is something that devs of shitty games like this cant be bothered with.

So Ill just say...metacritic does not back your statement above.

 

Sony made the PS3 hard to develop for on purpose to completey stop any chances of a shitty desv even being able to get a square box running at more then 1 FPS CONFIRMED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1



Nobody's perfect. I aint nobody!!!

Killzone 2. its not a fps. it a FIRST PERSON WAR SIMULATOR!!!! ..The true PLAYSTATION 3 launch date and market dominations is SEP 1st

I guess being 1% higher than 360 is an arguing point now. and being 2% lower (Wii) means bottom of the barrel and absolutely nothing to play.



deathgod33 said:
MontanaHatchet said:
http://www.gamerankings.com/browse.html?site=ps3&cat=0&year=0&numrev=0&sort=1&letter=&search=

i think it's more important that a console has more good games than have less bad ones.

no kidding, PS2 had more bad games than the Gamecube had games.



Around the Network

Just when I was gonna get Hour of Victory to enjoy some GameCrap this game comes out. Go figure.



It's just that simple.

Lol, wut?



There are some bad games out there right now.



I got Drake and Stake for the original XBox and I beat Batman Dark Tomorrow on the original XBox.

It gives you some sort of satisfying feeling when you play and beat some craptastic games.

The only real crappy game I beat on the XBox 360 so far was Alone in the Dark and Eragon or whatever that movie based game was.



It's just that simple.

Seems like bigger the library the lower the average score. Do people tend to buy games with lower score? They don't want to buy shovelwares. You can crossout all the games with crappy scores.