By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General Discussion - so, What do people make of this?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/8216122.stm

FBI boss attacks Megrahi release

FBI director Robert Mueller has launched a scathing attack on Scottish Justice Secretary Kenny MacAskill over the release of the Lockerbie bomber.

In a letter, dated 21 August, Mr Mueller said the decision makes "a mockery of justice" and gives comfort to terrorists around the world.

Abdelbaset Ali al-Megrahi has received a hero's welcome in Libya.

The Scottish Government said it had consulted widely in the US and UK and had made the right decision.

Mr Mueller was previously a Justice Department lawyer leading the investigation into the 1988 bombing.

The director's letter is also being sent to families of the Lockerbie victims.

Mr Mueller wrote: "Your action in releasing Megrahi is as inexplicable as it is detrimental to the cause of justice. Indeed your action makes a mockery of the rule of law.

"Your action gives comfort to terrorists around the world who now believe that regardless of the quality of the investigation, the conviction by jury after the defendant is given all due process, and sentence appropriate to the crime, the terrorist will be freed by one man's exercise of 'compassion'."

Mr Mueller said that he had made it a practice not to comment on the actions of other prosecutors, but that the release of terminally ill Megrahi had prompted a change of heart.

He added: "Your action makes a mockery of the emotions, passions and pathos of all those affected by the Lockerbie tragedy: the medical personnel who first faced the horror of 270 bodies strewn in the fields around Lockerbie, and in the town of Lockerbie itself; the hundreds of volunteers who walked the fields of Lockerbie to retrieve any piece of debris related to the break-up of the plane; the hundreds of FBI agents and Scottish police who undertook an unprecedented global investigation to identify those responsible; the prosecutors who worked for years - in some cases a full career - to see justice done."

The FBI director said he was outraged by the move, and criticised the MSP for failing to consult "partners in the investigation and prosecution of those responsible for the Lockerbie tragedy".

He wrote: "You have given those who sought to assure that the persons responsible would be held accountable the back of your hand. You have given Megrahi a 'jubilant welcome' in Tripoli, according to the reporting. Where, I ask, is the justice?"

A Scottish Government spokesman said the minister had made the right decision for the "right reasons" on the basis of due process, clear evidence, and recommendations from the parole board and prison governor.

He said: "Compassionate release is not part of the US justice system but it is part of Scotland's.

"Mr MacAskill could not have consulted more widely - he spoke with the US families, the US Attorney General, Secretary of State Clinton and many others.

"The US authorities indicated that although they were opposed to both prisoner transfer and compassionate release, they made it clear that they regarded compassionate release as far preferable to the transfer agreement, and Mr Mueller should be aware of that."

The spokesman said that Mr Mueller should also be aware that while many families have opposed Mr MacAskill's decision many others have supported it.

He added that the justice secretary would reply to Mr Mueller in due course.

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 



Around the Network

Well, Scifiboy you are not going to like my response. He should have gotten the death penalty



dsister44 said:
Well, Scifiboy you are not going to like my response. He should have gotten the death penalty

well, as you know, im opposed the Death Penalty in any situation, so no, I dont agree with that.

personally, so far as I can tell it is the decision of the Scottish government what to do with prisoners under there purview, so why the US and UK central government are involved is confusing to me, as for the decision itself, its a difficult one, I mean, he is gonna die anyway and he is no longer a threat to society...so I can understand the reasons to release him, though the Libiyan reaction was rather tactless given the circumstances. 



SciFiBoy said:
dsister44 said:
Well, Scifiboy you are not going to like my response. He should have gotten the death penalty

well, as you know, im opposed the Death Penalty in any situation, so no, I dont agree with that.

personally, so far as I can tell it is the decision of the Scottish government what to do with prisoners under there purview, so why the US and UK central government are involved is confusing to me, as for the decision itself, its a difficult one, I mean, he is gonna die anyway and he is no longer a threat to society...so I can understand the reasons to release him, though the Libiyan reaction was rather tactless given the circumstances. 

I agree with you there. It is no business of either the United States or British governments.

But I do not think he should have been let out of jail. He killed 270+ people. He should not have been released from prison to recieve a "hero's welcome" back in Libya.



Makes you wonder.



Around the Network
dsister44 said:
SciFiBoy said:
dsister44 said:
Well, Scifiboy you are not going to like my response. He should have gotten the death penalty

well, as you know, im opposed the Death Penalty in any situation, so no, I dont agree with that.

personally, so far as I can tell it is the decision of the Scottish government what to do with prisoners under there purview, so why the US and UK central government are involved is confusing to me, as for the decision itself, its a difficult one, I mean, he is gonna die anyway and he is no longer a threat to society...so I can understand the reasons to release him, though the Libiyan reaction was rather tactless given the circumstances. 

I agree with you there. It is no business of either the United States or British governments.

But I do not think he should have been let out of jail. He killed 270+ people. He should not have been released from prison to recieve a "hero's welcome" back in Libya.

well, the Scottish government said its on Compassionate grounds because he's gonna die and is no longer a threat to society, which makes sense to me anyway, but yeah, like i said, Libya didnt do themselves any favours with that welcome. I know some people would argue that he doesnt deserve compassion and i totaly understand why but that said, I think compassion is an important thing, so in a way the Scottish government can claim the morale high ground on that, by saying, you may not have compassion for others, but we will show you that we are capable of it for you despite that. (im probably making this point badly, sounder better in my head really)



How about, it wasn't the libian's. Well apparently they convicted him on the only evidence they had, a piece of circuit board smaller than your smallest fingernail. Not only that but they never even tested it for explosive residue.



“When we make some new announcement and if there is no positive initial reaction from the market, I try to think of it as a good sign because that can be interpreted as people reacting to something groundbreaking. ...if the employees were always minding themselves to do whatever the market is requiring at any moment, and if they were always focusing on something we can sell right now for the short term, it would be very limiting. We are trying to think outside the box.” - Satoru Iwata - This is why corporate multinationals will never truly understand, or risk doing, what Nintendo does.

Americans were killed abroad in this attack they should have released him to us to be tried



Repent or be destroyed

It's not a US matter so I don't see why a representative of the FBI feels as though he should get involved. Sometimes I swear some the Americans think USA=World.

Anyway, the nature of his crime is disgusting and life in prison is a just punishment, but in a case where the criminal is at deaths door then perhaps one last taste of freedom on compassionate will be good for him. Really for no other grounds that it will really make him reflect on the bad choices he made and the life he's missed out on because of his crimes before he dies...

Perhaps then he will realise the sanctity of life and realise the true extent of what he had caused.



SciFiBoy said:
dsister44 said:
Well, Scifiboy you are not going to like my response. He should have gotten the death penalty

well, as you know, im opposed the Death Penalty in any situation, so no, I dont agree with that.

personally, so far as I can tell it is the decision of the Scottish government what to do with prisoners under there purview, so why the US and UK central government are involved is confusing to me, as for the decision itself, its a difficult one, I mean, he is gonna die anyway and he is no longer a threat to society...so I can understand the reasons to release him, though the Libiyan reaction was rather tactless given the circumstances. 

The U.S. government is involved because the majority of the people murdered on that plane were American.