Technically those two things measure different things at slightly different times. Think of it as two different indicators that provide information that the other doesn't but miss information that the other one does. Both are important. Its not abnormal for one to rise and the other to go down. Yes, the job loss numbers are more reliable, but that doesn't mean that they provide the full picture.
http://business.theatlantic.com/2009/08/unemployment_rate_down_but_unemployment_up.php
All that jobs information comes from the BLS's establishment survey of about 150,000 businesses, nonprofits, government agencies, etc. The unemployment rate comes from a Census Bureau survey of 60,000 households. Because of the smaller sample size and other factors, the household survey is generally seen as a less reliable indicator of month-to-month changes in the job market. But because the establishment survey can miss new businesses, the household survey sometimes provides signs of an employment turning point before the establishment survey does. Unreliable signs, but nonetheless, here they are: Employment was up 113,000 in July (sorry, got my numbers mixed up) down just 155,000, seasonally adjusted, according to the household survey. And in case you don't trust those seasonal adjustments, it was up 229,000 unadjusted. So hooray for that.
And if you account for discouraged workers/people who want full time work but only get part time, number of hours people are working, and average pay, which many people claim are more reliable indicators, the numbers did improve.
http://www.realclearmarkets.com/news/ap/finance_business/2009/Aug/07/job_losses_slow_to_247_000__jobless_rate_dips.html
If laid-off workers who have given up looking for new jobs or have settled for part-time work are included the unemployment rate would have been 16.3 percent in July. That's down from 16.5 percent in June, which was the highest on records dating to 1994.
With companies feeling a bit better about the economy's prospects and their own, they boosted workers' hours in July. The average work week rose to 33.1 hours, after having fallen to 33 hours in June, the lowest on records dating to 1964.
Average hourly earnings rose to $18.56 in July, up from $18.53 in June. Hourly earnings were stagnant in June. Average weekly earnings, which fell in June, rose to $614.34. Those gains raised hopes that consumers — whose spending accounts for the single-largest slice of economic activity — will feel more confident and more inclined to spend in the months ahead, thus helping the recovery.
Not to mention the job loss numbers for previous months were overestimated, which also factors in to the unemployment numbers. But I guess you guys probably didn't even know about that:
http://www.realclearmarkets.com/news/ap/finance_business/2009/Aug/07/job_losses_slow_to_247_000__jobless_rate_dips.html
Also heartening: job losses in May and June turned out to be less than previously reported. Employers sliced 303,000 positions in May, versus 322,000 previously logged. And, they cut 443,000 in June, compared with an earlier estimate of 467,000.
We had two bags of grass, seventy-five pellets of mescaline, five sheets of high-powered blotter acid, a salt shaker half full of cocaine, a whole galaxy of multi-colored uppers, downers, screamers, laughers…Also a quart of tequila, a quart of rum, a case of beer, a pint of raw ether and two dozen amyls. The only thing that really worried me was the ether. There is nothing in the world more helpless and irresponsible and depraved than a man in the depths of an ether binge. –Raoul Duke
It is hard to shed anything but crocodile tears over White House speechwriter Patrick Buchanan's tragic analysis of the Nixon debacle. "It's like Sisyphus," he said. "We rolled the rock all the way up the mountain...and it rolled right back down on us...." Neither Sisyphus nor the commander of the Light Brigade nor Pat Buchanan had the time or any real inclination to question what they were doing...a martyr, to the bitter end, to a "flawed" cause and a narrow, atavistic concept of conservative politics that has done more damage to itself and the country in less than six years than its liberal enemies could have done in two or three decades. -Hunter S. Thompson