By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - How big of a blow to MS would it be if Gears of war 2, lost oddysey

Bonafide732 said:
to make his point i dont ever remember seeing a trailer of Devil May Cry 4 that said PS3 ONLY at the end of it.... and its clearly on FF and MGS4.. and kojima has clearly stated it many times URnotE has the exact quote on his signature.. kojima stated it again at E3 .... 07... jack trenton said at e3 that if it ever went to the 360 it would be quite some time after the ps3 verson..because of the exclusive deal

Does it have to be?  DO we see a giant letters that say xbox 360 only after halo 3? No we see the platforms its only, and its only on xbox 360, so that means, its xbox 360 only.

And yes there is a exclusive deal for a time frame.

How many times do we have to state this Kojima has Very little say on to where it goes, its Konamis game and they decide



                 With regard to Call of Duty 4 having an ultra short single player campaign, I guess it may well have been due to the size limitations of DVD on the XBox 360, one of various limitations multi-platform game designers will have to take into consideration-Mike B   

Proud supporter of all 3 console companys

Proud owner of 360wii and DS/psp              

Game trailers-Halo 3 only dissapointed the people who wanted to be dissapointed.

Bet with Harvey Birdman that Lost Odyssey will sell more then Blue dragon did.
Around the Network
jhlennon1 said:
leo-j said:
When the rumers arose of it being ported to 360 CAPCOM STATED: " THE GAME WILL NEVER BE ON ANY OTHER CONSOLE THAN THE PLAYSTATION 3' What happened? $$$$$$$

Capcom have always been like that though, it was not a surprise and it was nothing new. Capcom took Resident Evil off the PS2 and put it exclusive on the Gamecube after the success of the PS1 and then screwed Nintendo by putting the series back on the PS2 again. That has been Capcom's nature for many years but tell me did Konami and S-E start that policy? And I can tell you for fact that Kojima/Nomura/Kitase have a lot more say about which platforms their games go then Mikami ever did with Capcom.

The situations totally don't compare. Capcom have never been has defensive as Kojima is with MGS4. EVER.

Of course Nomura and Kitase have more say, its developed and published by the same company,

MGS4 is not published by Kojima, its by Konomi or whoever, and they get to decide.

Its not like SE and Konomi have betrayed companys many times, just look at DQ 9 being ds, is that no backstabbing sony? They did it for profits, and you can bet your ass Konomi would do it for MGS4 if the profits were there



                 With regard to Call of Duty 4 having an ultra short single player campaign, I guess it may well have been due to the size limitations of DVD on the XBox 360, one of various limitations multi-platform game designers will have to take into consideration-Mike B   

Proud supporter of all 3 console companys

Proud owner of 360wii and DS/psp              

Game trailers-Halo 3 only dissapointed the people who wanted to be dissapointed.

Bet with Harvey Birdman that Lost Odyssey will sell more then Blue dragon did.
jhlennon1 said:
leo-j said:
When the rumers arose of it being ported to 360 CAPCOM STATED: " THE GAME WILL NEVER BE ON ANY OTHER CONSOLE THAN THE PLAYSTATION 3' What happened? $$$$$$$

Capcom have always been like that though, it was not a surprise and it was nothing new. Capcom took Resident Evil off the PS2 and put it exclusive on the Gamecube after the success of the PS1 and then screwed Nintendo by putting the series back on the PS2 again. That has been Capcom's nature for many years but tell me did Konami and S-E start that policy? And I can tell you for fact that Kojima/Nomura/Kitase have a lot more say about which platforms their games go then Mikami ever did with Capcom.

The situations totally don't compare. Capcom have never been has defensive as Kojima is with MGS4. EVER.


yea i would have to agree with your statement.. kojima has always babied MGS .... URnotE does sorta make a point.... i have never seen a trailer of DMC4 that says ps3 only on it.. like some have claimed..... if someone finds one id love to be informed.....

To soriku and others if you owned multiple consoles you wouldnt have this problem.... maybe you should consider getting that beloved 40gb lol



THe oNLY TRue STuPiDiTY iS THe aCCePTaNCe oF iGNoRaNCe 

PSNTAG K_I_N_G__COKE

  The King Of The Iron Fist tournament

@URNotE its not a double standered, you just needed to pick better exsamples aka non first party games, MGS and FF are both 3rd party hence they could go multiplatform, why not say dead rising 2, lost planet, doa, Hitman, bioshock or heck, even say these games are sony timed exclusives, its not so much trolling, as it seems a waste of time since sony would have to buy the rights or MS offer them.

to cap its more the games you chose, it would be like me going hey Resistance: Fall of Man, is going on the 360 and wii, which wont happen.

so no bias just bad choice of examples



come play minecraft @  mcg.hansrotech.com

minecraft name: hansrotec

XBL name: Goddog

Lost tears of Kain said:
Bonafide732 said:
to make his point i dont ever remember seeing a trailer of Devil May Cry 4 that said PS3 ONLY at the end of it.... and its clearly on FF and MGS4.. and kojima has clearly stated it many times URnotE has the exact quote on his signature.. kojima stated it again at E3 .... 07... jack trenton said at e3 that if it ever went to the 360 it would be quite some time after the ps3 verson..because of the exclusive deal

Does it have to be?  DO we see a giant letters that say xbox 360 only after halo 3? No we see the platforms its only, and its only on xbox 360, so that means, its xbox 360 only.

And yes there is a exclusive deal for a time frame.

How many times do we have to state this Kojima has Very little say on to where it goes, its Konamis game and they decide


but see now you're doing the same BS that URnotE did of course we're not gonna see something like that on halo 3 plus halo is a 1st party game... dmc4 is not..



THe oNLY TRue STuPiDiTY iS THe aCCePTaNCe oF iGNoRaNCe 

PSNTAG K_I_N_G__COKE

  The King Of The Iron Fist tournament

Around the Network
Lost tears of Kain said:
jhlennon1 said:
leo-j said:
When the rumers arose of it being ported to 360 CAPCOM STATED: " THE GAME WILL NEVER BE ON ANY OTHER CONSOLE THAN THE PLAYSTATION 3' What happened? $$$$$$$

Capcom have always been like that though, it was not a surprise and it was nothing new. Capcom took Resident Evil off the PS2 and put it exclusive on the Gamecube after the success of the PS1 and then screwed Nintendo by putting the series back on the PS2 again. That has been Capcom's nature for many years but tell me did Konami and S-E start that policy? And I can tell you for fact that Kojima/Nomura/Kitase have a lot more say about which platforms their games go then Mikami ever did with Capcom.

The situations totally don't compare. Capcom have never been has defensive as Kojima is with MGS4. EVER.

Of course Nomura and Kitase have more say, its developed and published by the same company,

MGS4 is not published by Kojima, its by Konomi or whoever, and they get to decide.

Its not like SE and Konomi have betrayed companys many times, just look at DQ 9 being ds, is that no backstabbing sony? They did it for profits, and you can bet your ass Konomi would do it for MGS4 if the profits were there

If Konami had full say the game would have gone months ago, they don't have total control. Period.

And what does DQ9 have to do with anything? Different situation. There was no misleading backstabbing information with that. They announced it for the DS straight, no problem with that. FF not the same though, not only did the ADD "For PLAYSTATION 3 ONLY" to the TGS trailers but Nomura reported to Famitsu that they are only making the games on the PS3 and that the PS3 was KEY aspect to the games and that the hardware makes all their dreams for the games possible.

Not the same, not the same at all.



i agree i should have made some better examples... sorry for wasting some of your time but i just had to prove my point....even now still no proof as previously stated earlier...



URNOTE Proud Owner of a 60GB PS3 Console (Purchased 12/22/06)

 #1 reason MGS4 is PS3 exclusive  xbox is too loud for snake to sneak around
PSNTAG= Xander732

jhlennon1 said:
Lost tears of Kain said:
jhlennon1 said:
leo-j said:
When the rumers arose of it being ported to 360 CAPCOM STATED: " THE GAME WILL NEVER BE ON ANY OTHER CONSOLE THAN THE PLAYSTATION 3' What happened? $$$$$$$

Capcom have always been like that though, it was not a surprise and it was nothing new. Capcom took Resident Evil off the PS2 and put it exclusive on the Gamecube after the success of the PS1 and then screwed Nintendo by putting the series back on the PS2 again. That has been Capcom's nature for many years but tell me did Konami and S-E start that policy? And I can tell you for fact that Kojima/Nomura/Kitase have a lot more say about which platforms their games go then Mikami ever did with Capcom.

The situations totally don't compare. Capcom have never been has defensive as Kojima is with MGS4. EVER.

Of course Nomura and Kitase have more say, its developed and published by the same company,

MGS4 is not published by Kojima, its by Konomi or whoever, and they get to decide.

Its not like SE and Konomi have betrayed companys many times, just look at DQ 9 being ds, is that no backstabbing sony? They did it for profits, and you can bet your ass Konomi would do it for MGS4 if the profits were there

If Konami had full say the game would have gone months ago, they don't have total control. Period.

And what does DQ9 have to do with anything? Different situation. There was no misleading backstabbing information with that. They announced it for the DS straight, no problem with that. FF not the same though, not only did the ADD "For PLAYSTATION 3 ONLY" to the TGS trailers but Nomura reported to Famitsu that they are only making the games on the PS3 and that the PS3 was KEY aspect to the games and that the hardware makes all their dreams for the games possible.

Not the same, not the same at all.


Sony also has a exclusive deal with MGS4 at least a certain time period, take that into consideration?

Alright you dont like that SE example lets try this one

When Square announced that the new FF would not be on a nintendo console, but on the playstation, they did that becaus it would be CHEAPER. Companys do it for money.



                 With regard to Call of Duty 4 having an ultra short single player campaign, I guess it may well have been due to the size limitations of DVD on the XBox 360, one of various limitations multi-platform game designers will have to take into consideration-Mike B   

Proud supporter of all 3 console companys

Proud owner of 360wii and DS/psp              

Game trailers-Halo 3 only dissapointed the people who wanted to be dissapointed.

Bet with Harvey Birdman that Lost Odyssey will sell more then Blue dragon did.

@urnoite

you proved your point by showing the number of damned Hypocrites on this board

@jhlennon

DITTO!



Supporter of

 SONY & Nintendo

 Consoles owned - SNES, N64, PS, GC, PS2, PSP, PS3

 I DO NOT support Xbox

My prediction for YEARS END:

WII - 18.3 Million

Xbox 360 - 15 Million

Playstation 3 - 8.5 Million

another reason i believe MGS4 is not going multi is because of MGSOnline.. i see that as another way for them trying to get more profits... you can call me a troll all you want but like i said I Have A good enough reputation on here to prove all of you wrong on that for the people who think it



URNOTE Proud Owner of a 60GB PS3 Console (Purchased 12/22/06)

 #1 reason MGS4 is PS3 exclusive  xbox is too loud for snake to sneak around
PSNTAG= Xander732