Quantcast
How would you feel if someone gave Killzone2 a 7 without seeing multiplayer

Forums - Gaming Discussion - How would you feel if someone gave Killzone2 a 7 without seeing multiplayer

@psrock nobody, all consoles are weak to me, I don't look for graphical power in consoles, only good games that control well.



Around the Network

I look at graphical power in consoles. And I have since making the switch from 2600 to Colecovision. I always try to get the console that will have the best graphics at the most affordable price. I guess that's the 360 now ( of course it's only the best graphics at the most affordable price because I don't pay for anything extra. I have no xbox live arcade points and only a silver membership to xbox live). And that is the console I own.



I have a 360 for JRPGs in general, but companies keep porting them to the PS3 or come out with a better version for PS3 that I'm thinking about selling the damn thing(360) atm because I've beaten them all already. I look for games, not graphical power, and when a console doesn't get used much any more, it's value ends.



Zen is rite.

Passion is good. It makes u alive.

Gamepro magazine should be burned, and that Kim guy roasted.



psrock said:
I'm sorry but this is getting on my nerves. It's one fucking review, and most of the people complaining are the same people who told ps3 fans to calm down after the Infamous Eurogamer review.

Where were you after Lair, Haze, Rachet, Uncharted, Killzone got bias reviews? It happens to all consoles, and we are wrong for overreacting to someones opinion.

Yeah the wii get blasted for its lacked of power, duh, just like the PS3 get blasted for being expensive and hard to develop for.

Wrong, the infamous review wasn't blamed on the PS3, this review is directly stated in the review that its low score is blamed on the Wii, and also, the reviewer said he didn't even play the multplayer.

Why do people who always start off with the words "I'm sorry" end up saying things out of frusteration, rather than calm clarity. You can see the difference, just think about it.



I don't need your console war.
It feeds the rich while it buries the poor.
You're power hungry, spinnin' stories, and bein' graphics whores.
I don't need your console war.

NO NO, NO NO NO.

Around the Network
psrock said:

One question, who do you blame for the wii lack of graphical power?

While on a daily basis we hear about Sony being blamed for 360 third party games looking better since they make it hard to develop for, just this week someone make thread on how Nintendo consoles are more reliable than xbox360 and Ps3, but the Minute someone brings up the Wii's weakness, a meltdown takes place.

Nitendo decided not to make a powerful console which will never looked as good as the competition, they shift their focus on motion control which payed off greatly, but when developers try to bring FPS to it, which the competition  has tons of amazing versions to begin with, it will be imposible to live up to the hype. And, i blame Nintendo for it. And yes, people will bring up the control, and one of the important aspect of a game too, but it's not all there is to a game since all games if worked on properly can have great control too.

If thats the case then they should start blaming MS and Sony for not having ir controlls in FPS too and deduct points for it.

I dont agree with you what he wrotes has nothing to do with a review at least the part i pointed out earlier and all games should be rewied on the merits of their console and not compare crossconsole unless the game in question is a multiplatform game.

Writing what he did for a Wii exclusive game is reprehensable and he should get fired for it, I bet you if he did the same to a hd console game he wouldnt have a job now. 



Vaio - "Bury me at Milanello"      R.I.P AC Milan

In the 60's, people took acid to make the world weird.
Now the world is weird  and people take Prozac  to make it normal.

If laughing is the best medicine and marijuana makes you laugh

Is marijuana the best medicine?

"Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind."

“If any creator has not played Mario, then they’re probably not a good creator. That’s something I can say with 100 percent confidence. Mario is, for game creators, the development bible.

Shadowblind said:

Gamepro not allowed to have an opinion confirmed?

No reviewer should review a game without playing most of it, and also, no reviewer should base a games quality on the console it was developed for.

Absolutely confirmed. You don't disagree, I know. Unless you think ToV sucked because of RRoD.



I don't need your console war.
It feeds the rich while it buries the poor.
You're power hungry, spinnin' stories, and bein' graphics whores.
I don't need your console war.

NO NO, NO NO NO.

Alic0004 said:
Most reviews on Metacritic put this game at 80 or 78. Calling an 8-10 point deviation an "injustice" of the world seems a bit extreme.

I haven't read the review, though. Sounds like the reviewer was a dick.

The numerical score has nothing to do with the text and tone of the review. Why don't you read it and tell me what you think. I don't have a link handy, I'm posting this all from my phone, but go to gamepro and read this trash. :(



I don't need your console war.
It feeds the rich while it buries the poor.
You're power hungry, spinnin' stories, and bein' graphics whores.
I don't need your console war.

NO NO, NO NO NO.

Adobo said:
can you not enjoy a game while ignoring some stupid game site completely?

I haven't played the game. Don't plan to. I'm not a fan of the game. However, this review is completely unfair to the game and those people who spent a lot of time developing it. It is unfair, and should be stood up against.



I don't need your console war.
It feeds the rich while it buries the poor.
You're power hungry, spinnin' stories, and bein' graphics whores.
I don't need your console war.

NO NO, NO NO NO.

vaio said:
psrock said:

One question, who do you blame for the wii lack of graphical power?

While on a daily basis we hear about Sony being blamed for 360 third party games looking better since they make it hard to develop for, just this week someone make thread on how Nintendo consoles are more reliable than xbox360 and Ps3, but the Minute someone brings up the Wii's weakness, a meltdown takes place.

Nitendo decided not to make a powerful console which will never looked as good as the competition, they shift their focus on motion control which payed off greatly, but when developers try to bring FPS to it, which the competition  has tons of amazing versions to begin with, it will be imposible to live up to the hype. And, i blame Nintendo for it. And yes, people will bring up the control, and one of the important aspect of a game too, but it's not all there is to a game since all games if worked on properly can have great control too.

If thats the case then they should start blaming MS and Sony for not having ir controlls in FPS too and deduct points for it.

I dont agree with you what he wrotes has nothing to do with a review at least the part i pointed out earlier and all games should be rewied on the merits of their console and not compare crossconsole unless the game in question is a multiplatform game.

Writing what he did for a Wii exclusive game is reprehensable and he should get fired for it, I bet you if he did the same to a hd console game he wouldnt have a job now. 

bleh he edited it, and I was gonna ask him how KZ2 or Conduit were multiplat games but you beat me to it. he's not being very logical as a starship captain atm, the federation would be disappointed =P.