even Daemon Hatfield wouldn't review a game as bad as this guy

I don't really care for reviews, but this one has a lot of things I can't overlook.

You can customize the controls anyway you like.

It's confirmed, he has multiple personality disorder.

I don't care about online, but how can you review a game and not play it online?

I would say The Conduit's graphics blows Goldeneye's out of the water.

Also, I regret the fact that I gave that site hits.

Wait Gamepro is still in publication? Seriously? All of the great magazines that have fallen by the wayside and Gamepro is still being printed. The owners must have sold their souls to Satan...

Holy hell, seriously? There should have been no way for the review to be published. Seriously, fail review is fail

3.5, it doesn't look as good as golden eye AND I didn't play the multiplayer, I'm perfectly in the right to review this game right guys?... guys? Why are you guys grabbing torches? NO NO PLEASE DON'T BURN ME!!!!

/Grabs torch

He's taking a jab at Nintendo itself at the opening paragraph!

"I'm not sure who I should blame for The Conduit's shortcomings. Do I blame the developer for making a rather generic shooter with a convoluted storyline that isn't as epic or mysterious as it wants to be or do I blame Nintendo for creating a console whose lack of hardware power essentially handcuffs every developer who tries to create a `next-gen` game for it?"

Talk about bias / laziness / lack of professionism.

This is completely ridiculous. If i have just read what is supposedly a review of the Conduit, then Gamepro are the most immature, biased retards i have ever encountered.

Sorry, what!? He didn't bother with multiplayer, so why is he even reviewing the game? Just read this horrendous piece of work. I see little more than constant jabs at the Wii's hardware and the fact that they believe the Conduit is trying to be the new Goldeneye007 and Perfect Dark. Just look how this pathetic review contradicts IGN's review in almost every regard... story, controls, everything. Who.. who wrote this? I can pull a better review out of my ass.

The graphics are terrible? No, i'm calling total bullshit on this one too, what a fucking lie, the graphics are absolutely brilliant for a Wii game. I have never read such idiocy in a very long time. He also didn't bother to customize the controls and then complains about it! For fuck sake. For. Fuck. Sake. The guy didn't even pay attention to the story at all and then goes on to say how rubbish and confusing it is. How is it such a moronic being is alive in this day and age?

No. Fuck this. This isn't a review, it's total bullshit. The guy does nothing but complain the entire time and then slaps a 3.5/5 on the game? Fuck off. There is contradiction all over this poor piece of work, What sort of fucking lunatic was asked to review this game, i quite honestly have never read a more backward review. Haha... just look at it, it's disgusting, he constantly compared this game to other shooters and consistently takes stabs at the Wii. If this is supposed to be a legitimate review of the Conduit, then my name is Cloud Strife.

mike_intellivision said: Goldeneye 007 (N64) images from Gamespot. Saying the game does not look better than Goldeneye on the N64 is just another proof that some reviewers (a) are poor at their jobs or (b) do not like the Wii.

you forgotto say mike from morgantown :P

This is why I hate online articles about videogame reviews...when it is clearly written by a fanboy, you just can't burn the article and head to the company with pitchforks and torches...