They must have been paid by sony in chocolate coins seeing as sony don't have proper money at the moment lol......

If by that you mean that what I posted was 100 percent accurate, then yes, yes it was.

As far as the Sony conference, here is what the media thought:

http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=75790&page=1

The Sony conference was great. The best stuff was for the PSP, and in all honesty, giving Sony the crown is misleading. Most people who hear "Sony won E3" are going to think of the PS3, and not the PSP.

Anyway, I'm not here to bring up "Who won E3" but rather to comment on this particular article. Don't flame me for it.

I don't see the article or OP claiming that the PS3 won, rather than Sony.

To be honest though, it's absolutely irrelevant. PS3 and PSP both contributed to Sony winning E3 in Joystiq's eyes.

Stop being a nuisance.

Yeah, this "article" reads like a blog entry, and does not link back to Joystiq. I RSS Joystiq, so if they actually declared the winner to be the PS3, I would have seen the article by now either on my phone or on my feed reader.

well they could of showed off more ps3 games but they need to balance it out between ps3 and psp.

I agree. Fall 2009-2010 is going to be an awesome time for HD Gamers: Bayonetta, Splinter Cell: Conviction, Modern Warfare 2, Forza 3, Uncharted 2, Demon's Souls, Halo ODST and much more. I may have to get a summer job.

lol dude seriously. Fail

No it's not misleading saying sony got the crown when they do have multiple platforms. I think most people think of the ps2,psp and the ps3 when they think sony :p And you can't prove otherwise.

@ Staude, how much do you think they will let me take one of their platforms off their hands for? Do you have a dollar estimate?

Don't be a dick. I never said that, and you know it.

The tools of warfare matter less than how they are implemented. At the start of this generation, there was no technology available to Nintendo that was not also available to Sony and Microsoft. Nintendo chose to ignore HD. Sony and Microsoft chose to ignore motion controls.

Nintendo's use of  motion control, their strategy to build games around it and blow the gaming market wide open, is what MS and Sony are desperate to copy now (and what Sony pitifully tried to copy with its sixaxis controller earlier).

Not sure about you but I would much rather see a console that can deliver top quality graphics in stunning 1080P HD, superb media and online features which can easily add motion controls at a later date, both ps3 and 360 are now doing this,

The Wii's advantage is motion controls, they don't have the graphics power or media/online features to fall back on when all the consoles come out with motion controls, this will be a disaster for the Wii as it's ONLY advantage (motion controls) will no longer matter, the wii has nothing else to offer, the hd consoles will have motion control games that actually look amazing, something never ever possible on the wii, can you imagine how much a game like wii sports would sell on the HD consoles that looked stunning and relistic? millions, this is all it would take for the hd consoles to get into full swing on the motion control front,

Tell me honestly, do you think the Wii would be where it is now without the motion controls? of course not, it would have failed just like the gamecube, the ps3/360 are in a very good place right now, if they pull the motion controls off right the wii will be in a lot of trouble and both hd consoles could easily catch up (maybe even pass) the wii, noone knows how the rest of this generation will pan out, we're only half way through and the wii is already on it's limits whilst also seeing falling sales (still high though but for how long?)......