By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sales Discussion - Why the PS3 will not last long, let alone 10 years.

HappySqurriel said:

According to Sony's own numbers ( http://www.sony.net/SonyInfo/IR/financial/fr/08q4_sony.pdf ) the operating loss of the gaming division for the year that ended March 31st 2009 was $529 Million ...

I think that it is reasonable to assume that the PS2 and PSP in hardware and software sales are (at least) breaking even, which would imply that after software sales were considered for the PS3 Sony was losing $50 for every console they sold. Even if Sony was profitable at this point in time on combined PS3 software and hardware sales, their numbers alone tell me that they're (probably) still losing a lot on each PS3 they sell.

Isn't this naive? I mean, you assume that game division=PSP+PS2+PS3, thus if PSP and PS2 are breaking even, then each PS3 is causing a loss?

Actually we know that each PS3 is sold at about $40 loss, thus it brings profit with software and accessories. Hey, if I assume that PSP is breaking even, then it must mean that the PS2 is losing them a lot of money!

But in reality the game division finances are probably weighted by fixed expenses, needed to keep up the whole personnel and service infrastructure, and by development expenses for things like the new digital distribution on PSPgo etc. Some of these expenses can hardly be split cleanly between the consoles: where do you account the PSN or the PSP/PS3 integration? What about the PS3/Mobile one?

The most likely reality is that all consoles at this point are profitable when you combine hardware and software. They're just not profitable enough to cover structural and R&D expenses, with the exchange rate of yen and the declining sales of the PS2 line being the main culprits. Saying that "they are losing a lot on each PS3 they sell" looks like the result of simplistic and wrong deduction.



"All you need in life is ignorance and confidence; then success is sure." - Mark Twain

"..." - Gordon Freeman

Around the Network
WereKitten said:
HappySqurriel said:

According to Sony's own numbers ( http://www.sony.net/SonyInfo/IR/financial/fr/08q4_sony.pdf ) the operating loss of the gaming division for the year that ended March 31st 2009 was $529 Million ...

I think that it is reasonable to assume that the PS2 and PSP in hardware and software sales are (at least) breaking even, which would imply that after software sales were considered for the PS3 Sony was losing $50 for every console they sold. Even if Sony was profitable at this point in time on combined PS3 software and hardware sales, their numbers alone tell me that they're (probably) still losing a lot on each PS3 they sell.

Isn't this naive? I mean, you assume that game division=PSP+PS2+PS3, thus if PSP and PS2 are breaking even, then each PS3 is causing a loss?

Actually we know that each PS3 is sold at about $40 loss, thus it brings profit with software and accessories. Hey, if I assume that PSP is breaking even, then it must mean that the PS2 is losing them a lot of money!

But in reality the game division finances are probably weighted by fixed expenses, needed to keep up the whole personnel and service infrastructure, and by development expenses for things like the new digital distribution on PSPgo etc. Some of these expenses can hardly be split cleanly between the consoles: where do you account the PSN or the PSP/PS3 integration? What about the PS3/Mobile one?

The most likely reality is that all consoles at this point are profitable when you combine hardware and software. They're just not profitable enough to cover structural and R&D expenses, with the exchange rate of yen and the declining sales of the PS2 line being the main culprits. Saying that "they are losing a lot on each PS3 they sell" looks like the result of simplistic and wrong deduction.

Operating loss in Game improved 66.1 billion yen year-on-year to 58.5 billion yen. This is mainly due to an improvement in the operating performance of the PS3 business brought on by PS3 hardware cost reductions and increased sales of PS3 software. Here

Despite software and accesories, the division is still losing money, although less from the previous year. The software is not going to meet the gap.

The death spiral that was posited in the OP is not going to happen in this case, simply because the PS3 and Xbox 360 support each other. By which I mean, developers don't make Wii, 360, and PS3 games - they make Wii games and HD games, both of which they have 50m customers for. The current shift toward Wii development is simply a shift toward the equal balance Wii deserves, because as well as it is doing, it's nowhere near well enough to blow the HD twins away (in fact, it's not even beating them overall, which the PS2 did easily).

The moral of which is, as a Sony loyalist, I say: HOORAY FOR XBOX 360!!!

You've got it backwards. Microsoft is out to KILL Sony. Their whole goal is to stop and destroy the Play Station brand, and they are doing a good job thanks to both over shooting the market. Games on both consoles brings no benefit to Sony. It helps the third parties because it allows them to sell to more users. It helps Microsoft becuase it is stealing games from Sony, meaning they can one-up them. It is hurtful for Sony as they do not get the leg-up on Microsoft and lose out on some money from software were it exclusive. Also, Mircosoft is out to lose money on this adventure, so they will sell the farm to kill the Playstation. The buying exclusives has probably been a thorn in Sony's side becuase it makes it harder for them to hold onto exclusives without spending money the division does not have.

The death spiral will inneviabtly happen. It was stalled by the fact that 3rd parties can produces games for both consoles, peventing austronomical loses. The Wii is tracking above the PS2, so expect third parties move to the Wii as the gap grows. Don't forget that winning consoles have long lives where losing consoles have short ones.



BladeOfGod said:
this thread comes from the guy who thinks PS3 wont surpass N64

The PS2 will surpasses the ninteno 64 but not the 100,000,000 mark i dont even think that the mark of 75million either.



finalrpgfantasy said:
BladeOfGod said:
this thread comes from the guy who thinks PS3 wont surpass N64

The PS2 will surpasses the ninteno 64 but not the 100,000,000 mark i dont even think that the mark of 75million either.


hey genius, PS2 surpassed N64 a LOOOONG time ago



BladeOfGod said:
finalrpgfantasy said:
BladeOfGod said:
this thread comes from the guy who thinks PS3 wont surpass N64

The PS2 will surpasses the ninteno 64 but not the 100,000,000 mark i dont even think that the mark of 75million either.


hey genius, PS2 surpassed N64 a LOOOONG time ago

He Einstein, he meant the PS3.



Around the Network
Smashchu2 said:
BladeOfGod said:
finalrpgfantasy said:
BladeOfGod said:
this thread comes from the guy who thinks PS3 wont surpass N64

The PS2 will surpasses the ninteno 64 but not the 100,000,000 mark i dont even think that the mark of 75million either.


hey genius, PS2 surpassed N64 a LOOOONG time ago

He Einstein, he meant the PS3.

well than, he should correct that



@Smashchu2
You're quoting me, answering someone else, not answering to anything I wrote.

As for the death spiral and MS vs Sony? MS have done what they could with their money. They bought additional contents and exclusives, they launched early and went for a cheaper machine. They marketed heavily. They supported HD-DVD. The result? Sony was hurt. How could they not, coming from a generation of total dominance and having MS against them?

But many franchises that were PS2 exclusives are now multiplatforms, and still they sell more relatively on PS3 than on 360, when not in absolute terms. And the PS3 came into the game late and still is overtracking the 360, selling substantially in line with it during economic times that are about the worst imaginable for its pricing model, and still has equal stance in the eyes of the developers.

So if it hasn't happened yet, when is the death by hand of MS going to happen exactly? The marketshare progression of the last 3 years doesn't exactly show a vanishing Sony.



"All you need in life is ignorance and confidence; then success is sure." - Mark Twain

"..." - Gordon Freeman

I don't see how people are still echoing Sony's marketing tag line. No third place or second place console ever lasted longer than the marketleading console, ever. And damn sure not for 10 yrs.



Bet between Slimbeast and Arius Dion about Wii sales 2009:


If the Wii sells less than 20 million in 2009 (as defined by VGC sales between week ending 3d Jan 2009 to week ending 4th Jan 2010) Slimebeast wins and get to control Arius Dion's sig for 1 month.

If the Wii sells more than 20 million in 2009 (as defined above) Arius Dion wins and gets to control Slimebeast's sig for 1 month.

Arius, expecting the PS3 to outlast the market leader is unrealistic, but what got people riled up was the OP saying the PS3 wil only last till next year...it´s the guy´s opinion, however I think it´s as unrealistic as Sony´s 10 year plan.



Actually he said that it 'may decline sharply' in 2010. He didn't say withdrawn from the market or anything like that. Hell theres even a logical truth there, if the PS3 is up sharply in 2009 towards the end of the year then the console could decline sharply the next year as all consoles bang up against market saturation.



Tease.