Oh ok then, so you always were a blantant and open fanboy then? Either you're a reserved 360 fanboy that tries to seem unbiased, or a loud and outspoken 360 fanboy. I don't care which one you are personaly.
Or are you going to go back on your reply to me and say that you're not a 360 fanboy in the first place?
My very first Post
OK...I will admit...The PS2 is a Phenom when it comes to how much it sold and clearly had the best software line since the combonation of the genesis and the super nintendo...but the fact is that MGS 4 sold under 5million..and Halo 3 sold almost 10 million...You think that the Hardcore gamer would of thought to get MGS 4 since it is such a critticaly aclaimed series and has a huge following, superb development and tight graphics....oh that's right....becuase the Sony platform is only over 20 mil that explains it less than massive debut...and yes 5 mil is alot..but over 1 billion of hours of halo 3 being played on Xbox live does not sound like xbox 360 accepted defeat sounds like they are focusing on the formula that is working for them.... and i know that everyone in the sony camp was shaking their heads at Microsoft for paying for exclusive DLC..but hey dont get mad at Microsoft get mad at RockStar...and count PS3 lucky that Capcom stated that all their games will be multi platform...even though their games perform average on PS3 and very well on 360...i frankly think Microsoft is gonna focus on keeping their gamer base happy and let the developer community do as it will....as for sony's succsess...only a little over 3 mill in japan ..that's pathethic...sure 360 is doing worse but they're main target is america..
Me: "He's a PC fanboy you fool -_-
Sadly your post only shows how your own fanboyism blinds you."
You: "So do mine..Would you say that your post don't show your colors Akvod?"
As for your first post, there's many problems. You keep expecting me to be Omniscient or something. I don't even know what thread this is, nor its subject. Also, are you saying that people never change over time? If your first post indeed was unbiased, will that mean that you'll never become biased, or future posts won't be biased? My initial threads, in fact, were very critical about Sony. I asked "Was the Sixaxis a mistake"? I said that the PS3 is failing sales wise and that they needed to jump on 2009 and take full advantage of the strong line up it had.
However I have also made many pro-Sony, and subconsciously biased posts. Don't get me wrong, I don't say "I'm a Sony fanboy" and just spout bull shit. I try to contain myself like CGI and only bring in relevant, objective facts (for e.g. not bringing in sale numbers when talking about quality). I also fail many times.
Listen, if you think my intention here is to say "Aha! You ARE a dirty 360 fanboy", then you're wrong. I already made up my mind that you are a 360 fanboy. All I want is for you to either admit it, and accept it. CGI recently said "I'm biased towards Heavy Rain" before he countered the criticisms of other people and defended Heavy Rain in the recent HR thread. Usually when I talk about a game I never played I say "I never played this game, but here's what I think:..."
Fighting me, denying me, and rejecting me is to fight, deny, and reject human nature and its flaws. We're all biased/prejudiced in some form and extent. To say that we're absolutely, 100% tolerant and unbiased is a lie, or else why do we do double blind studies, and try so hard to reduce bias? And all I want you to do is accept that we're not perfect. I don't think any lower of you that you're a 360 fan. It's just that I see you and a few other posters that blatantly and so painstakingly obvious that they are fanboys, and yet act oblivious to it, shrug and go "I dunno?"
So answer me this, yes or no:
Are you 100% completely unbiased, or do you believe that you have some ammount of bias?