LOL at people saying "ooo harsh", you havn't even played the game yet how would you KNOW they're being harsh, and don't tell me "Oh but I have played the demo!!" sod the poxy demo you havn't played the full game so stop with the stupid insults towards Eurogamer.

And this proves that Eurogamer is retarted how?

metascore:

GTA IV - 98, Halo 3 - 94

Show me a "non-retarted" review site.

Can't you keep this in the official infamous thread?

http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=72915&page=2

i just dont trust or adhere to eurogamer reviews thats all.

Okay, with the 1up, CVG and Eurogamer scores added to the mix, the game currently has a metascore of 86,75 which is pretty much where people have been predicting it to be.

What... is... the... big... deal?

Well, it won't stop me from buying the game. I trust IGN scores anyhow.

Niether of those reviews prove it (though I personally think they are both overrated, just my opinion).  Though so far there have been about 8 other reviews all from 85-95, and they give it a 70.  Definetley out of the norm.  However, I'm guessing at least one other reviewer will give it a score along those lines, just because there will probably at least be one other person who thinks less of it than the "average" reviewer.  All that being said, it seems (so far) pretty safe to assume that the majority of reviewers will find this an 85-95 game.

since when is 7/10 bad? Some of you are as bad as Wii fans for screaming bias at reasonable reviews.

Yeah, I really don't see any problem with getting another great game.  Especially considerring that I remember Infamous's name coming up extremely often in that one thread about what the next critical bomb would be.  I'll have to see if I can find that thread later.

Eurogamer takes money from MS, does full page advertisement and then gives Fable 2 a 10/10. Though I suspect that has nothing to do with this score except that it proves that Sony needed to give them more money or something.