Death to another MGS4/360 rumour......

AussieGecko

Currently Offline

10,604

2560 posts since 22/04/09

Recent Badges:

Watch Your Back! Received 10,000 profile views.
Trust Me, It'll Have Legs 100 replies made to user's most popular thread.
11 Years Has been a VGChartz member for over 11 years.
12 Years Has been a VGChartz member for over 12 years.
2 Years Has been a VGChartz member for over 2 years.
Hit And Run 15 comments posted on VGChartz news articles.

AussieGecko on 17 May 2009

Kantor said:

Valve doesn't hate Sony. They used to be small PC , and they grew larger. The 360's architecture is similar to that of the PC, so they develop for 360, too. PS3 development would be too costly. However, if EA are willing to do it and mess it up (Orange Box), Gabe Newell is happy for the game to go to PS3.

I don't see why you would still get Ghostbusters on 360. It's coming out first on PS3. It will likely have exclusive content on PS3. Just "because of the controller"? I honestly don't get people's hate for the DS3. I find both controllers equally usable.

And Touch...that just proves my point about how desperate 360 fans are to have this game. They bash it and bash it and bash it, then go crazy when Kojima announces a new Metal Gear. "The power button is green, like the 360!" And like every other electronic product ever made! What about the "i"? How is that related to the 360?

And certainly, if BioWare made a deal with MS, it wouldn't be on PS3. But wouldn't they have said that? Wouldn't make them say that? If they have a deal binding to 360 exclusivity, what do they stand to from denying that there is no PS3 version? I'm thinking a late , if anything.

Maybe Xbox hasnt found the need for it, as Kojima has for PS3. Look at mass Effect 1 and also both Gears, they were never catogorically denied them being on the PS3, but it just died off. MS doesnt deny things i have noticed, A lot of PS3 developers seem the need to though.

The Metal Gear Touch thing was kinda funny now that i think about it. But if they were going to announce it i think that was the time. Even though Bioshock (i think) was announced a year later

Bet with Conegamer and Doobie_wop

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3879752

Kantor

Currently Offline

109,214

22077 posts since 19/06/08

Recent Badges:

Gaming Journalist 100 VGChartz news articles posted.
3 Years Has been a VGChartz member for over 3 years.
Hit And Run 15 comments posted on VGChartz news articles.
15 Years Has been a VGChartz member for over 15 years.
A Badge Within A Badge Earned 20 badges.
I'm Special VGChartz staff member.

Kantor on 17 May 2009

AussieGecko said:

Kantor said:

Valve doesn't hate Sony. They used to be small PC , and they grew larger. The 360's architecture is similar to that of the PC, so they develop for 360, too. PS3 development would be too costly. However, if EA are willing to do it and mess it up (Orange Box), Gabe Newell is happy for the game to go to PS3.

I don't see why you would still get Ghostbusters on 360. It's coming out first on PS3. It will likely have exclusive content on PS3. Just "because of the controller"? I honestly don't get people's hate for the DS3. I find both controllers equally usable.

And Touch...that just proves my point about how desperate 360 fans are to have this game. They bash it and bash it and bash it, then go crazy when Kojima announces a new Metal Gear. "The power button is green, like the 360!" And like every other electronic product ever made! What about the "i"? How is that related to the 360?

And certainly, if BioWare made a deal with MS, it wouldn't be on PS3. But wouldn't they have said that? Wouldn't make them say that? If they have a deal binding to 360 exclusivity, what do they stand to from denying that there is no PS3 version? I'm thinking a late , if anything.

Maybe Xbox hasnt found the need for it, as Kojima has for PS3. Look at mass Effect 1 and also both Gears, they were never catogorically denied them being on the PS3, but it just died off. MS doesnt deny things i have noticed, A lot of PS3 developers seem the need to though.

The Metal Gear Touch thing was kinda funny now that i think about it. But if they were going to announce it i think that was the time. Even though Bioshock (i think) was announced a year later

BioShock was announced in May 2008, while the 360 version came out in August 2007. So, less than a year. And once again, Ken Levine said "no PS3 development going on" (not even no plans for it), while Kojima said "No 360 version".

Gears of War is Microsoft published (though they don't own it), so there is quite an advanced contract there, making a PS3 version highly unlikely, if not impossible. Not to mention Cliffy B's hate of the PS3.

As for Mass Effect, that hasn't died off at all. In fact, the only reason it's not widespread is because Mass Effect was once owned by Microsoft, and we don't know exactly what the deal between MS and BioWare was.

(Former) Lead Moderator and (Eternal) VGC Detective

XxXProphecyXxX

Banned

3,562

2735 posts since 09/12/08

Recent Badges:

Open For Business Earned 10 badges.
Trust Me, It'll Have Legs 100 replies made to user's most popular thread.
The Nuts & Bolts Add a total of 25 games to your collection.
1st Birthday Has been a VGChartz member for over 1 year.
'Ello Princess! Awarded for signing up.
Hit And Run 15 comments posted on VGChartz news articles.

XxXProphecyXxX on 17 May 2009

Undying said:
This thread is the preparation H for sony butthurt.

Uhuh I see.....So what about the mgs4 comming to 360 twiter rumor(GOD this is even worst than this)? microsoft desperation?

AussieGecko

Currently Offline

10,604

2560 posts since 22/04/09

Recent Badges:

'Ello Princess! Awarded for signing up.
Congratulations on Pressing Start! Score your first game in your collection.
2 Years Has been a VGChartz member for over 2 years.
15 Years Has been a VGChartz member for over 15 years.
Making Friends 10 friends on gamrConnect.
4 Years Has been a VGChartz member for over 4 years.

AussieGecko on 17 May 2009

Kantor said:

BioShock was announced in May 2008, while the 360 version came out in August 2007. So, less than a year. And once again, Ken Levine said "no PS3 development going on" (not even no plans for it), while Kojima said "No 360 version".

Gears of War is Microsoft published (though they don't own it), so there is quite an advanced contract there, making a PS3 version highly unlikely, if not impossible. Not to mention Cliffy B's hate of the PS3.

As for Mass Effect, that hasn't died off at all. In fact, the only reason it's not widespread is because Mass Effect was once owned by Microsoft, and we don't know exactly what the deal between MS and BioWare was.

Did it come out on May 08 though? but that is a good 9 months. 360 are not big users of that phrase of "no ps3 version". There are times when they have said it for various reasons, but people on sites like this dismiss it like it was nothing. 'they are just saying it to get people off the track'. As far as 360 knew they had it and only them, well and pc. Otherwise surely they could not put such thing as "Only for 360 and PC" on the box.

I don't actually understand Cliffys hate for PS3, i find it amusing, and think MS should seriously looking at some how doing something with him personally (ie let him design a game or something). But alsohow did PS3 get ut first, Cliffy is the lead designer, he surely must have some say, maybe the relationship boomed with ms in that time perhaps? speculation really.

If it was owned by ms then surely it should be thrown out, I don't know, if mass effect 2 comes to ps3, then i think they will be without the original.

Bet with Conegamer and Doobie_wop

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3879752