By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - I find it disgraceful which console a game is on affects the opinions of it

You could just ignore these people. :/

Just a suggestion.



FootballFan - "GT has never been bigger than Halo. Now do a comparison between the two attach ratios and watch GT get stomped by Halo. Reach will sell 5 million more than GT5. Quote me on it."

Around the Network
richardhutnik said:

It was more of myself, trying to being an equal opportunity tiradist to be balanced.  And yes, blast it, I AM defending the Birthday game.  For MYSELF, it would be BEYOND LAME.  BUT, I see others having a use for it.

 

 

I'm with you. It's £1 per minigame. Considering some of the shit games people buy for full price (me included) I don't think it's bad value for money.

Not the game that I personally think I'd enjoy but my aunty enjoyed carnival games so I think I'll buy it for her BIRTHDAY.



Nov 2016 - NES outsells PS1 (JP)

Don't Play Stationary 4 ever. Switch!

I agree with what you say.



                            

axumblade said:
NES said:
You have to be half retarded to think Velvet Assassin would be good.

It seemed like it would be good but quickly turned into a typical Southpeak/Gamecock game. x.o

 

I wouldn't trust a game that is needed to reform the image of a company.  NOW, if a bunch of reviews come out that are positive, then I believe it would be appropriate to consider the game.  Until a company shows ANY title of ANY type that is good, why trust them?  There are publishers like Southpeak that feed at the bottom of the barrel, taking games rejected by other publishers, because they are in it for the money.

 



HanzoTheRazor said:
Too many fanboys this gen, that is the problam.

The industry got bigger.  The bigger the industry, the more fanboys it gets.  Eventhough this is true, the behavior is disgraceful on their part.