akuma587 said: If people think the Big Three went under because of their unions rather than the fact that they were making cars that people didn't want to buy, they are fooling themselves. I think people unfairly blame unions for problems businesses have. There are all kinds of things that go into a workplace environment besides what you get paid. And employers are just as likely to abuse their power as unions, and have more power to do so. It makes no sense to me how you will hear people talk about the importance of production jobs in America and how blue collar workers are the heart of America, and then they turn around and badmouth unions in the next sentence. People have been conditioned to think that unions do more harm than they actually do. People have also been conditioned to think that employers abuse their power less often than they actually do. |
But don't you think that having pay that is well above it's competitors was a contributing factor to the downfall of the Big 3?
The average UAW worker earns, after benefits, roughly $70/hr, whereas the average non-UAW worker earns $35/hr. With millions of workers putting in 40hr workweeks, that's a lot of extra overhead. That's not to say that it was the only factor, because Detroit was making bad decisions when it comes to cars.
That's not to say that businesses don't abuse their power, but to vacate any blame from the Unions is also a very bad assumption to make.
Raw labor to build a car costs about 30 man-hours per car. At a $30/hr difference between UAW and non-UAW employees, that's about a $900 difference per car, or $2.6 billion dollars in 2008 for GM alone (GM sold 2.98 million cars last year).
But more than just the simple loss of $2.6b (or about $5.0b between the Big 3 in 08) last year due to bloated union employee costs: the flexibility of the American union worker is very poor, and costs the company far more, due to Union regulations about what their employees can, and cannot do. Toyota, and other non-union companies can retool their employees as needed, giving them far more flexibility and less overall overhead (and better quality) due to their methods. So union issues run deeper than mere hourly wages.
I absolutely agree that the Big 3's issue is not the unions souly, but it's a significant contributor. Why is it that the Big 3 can do so well overseas, and do so horrible in the states with the same cars?
Back from the dead, I'm afraid.