By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Has the Xbox 360 accepted defeat in 2009?

gergroy on 13 April 2009
jellyfishprince said:
Onyxmeth said:
jellyfishprince said:
gergroy said:
jellyfishprince said:
seriously I dont even consider xbox360 to be in this generation race I believe it is only between wii and ps3 but lets face it lol there is no way the ps3 could win. the xbox360 is basically a overpriced wii minus motion control and I was reading that it can play hd-dvd but hd-dvd lost the war so why dont they remove it on new console maybe save some $$$?

I forget how xbox did last generation but didnt they only sell like 10 million console? gamecube sold like 5x that.

wow, how did you make it past the home page?  and you have posted 139 times?  amazing!

 

why are people so men to me on this website? so xbox sold 20 million that isn't that far off from my guess consider ps2 sold 100 million ok

 

It's because...

1. You don't consider 360 to be a part of this generation, which is just...laughable

2. You think the 360 is an overpriced Wii without motion controls, when all the people with eyesight realize 360 and PS3 are pretty close specs wise

3. You think the 360 plays HD-DVDs which it doesn't, and that makes your suggestion of removing the HD-DVD drive especially hilarious

4. You thought the Xbox sold 10 million

5. You thought the Gamecube sold 50 million

The best part was, there wasn't a single sentence in your post that didn't contain some form of lie or completely wrong observation.

 

1. i said it terms of competition

2. does it cost more than a wii? yes. does it not have motion controls? yes. your point? seriously can you read..

3. the hd-dvd drive WAS available for xbox360 many people did not know that but it existed. like i said if microsoft removed such drive from selling they would not have lost money

3. my mistake? wasnt far off from 20 million

5. 5 more of 25 million is gamecube which is correct

 

everything I said was correct it just shows nintendo fans like me are right but other fanboys do not read an djust jump in

 

wow, I was feeling bad for you because I thought you might of said some stuff, but realized you were wrong, but nope.  Again, everything you said here is also wrong.

1 360 is beating the ps3, so that doesn't make sense

2. it costs less and costs more.  However, it has hd graphics too, so it should cost more.

3. As an external drive only, it was never built in

4. again 20 million is incorrect, it was 25 million

5. nope, gamecube was 20 million

just goes to show you that some nintendo fans aren't right and just don't bother to read at all:)



Around the Network
Jeronimo66 on 13 April 2009

LOL, E3 in not too late, in fact E3 is the best time to anounce games,

.......and Microsoft already said there are games launching this year that have not been anounced yet.

I am 100% confident Microsoft will have a blockbuster lineup AGAIN this year, that will more than hold off the so-called competition.



JaggedSac on 13 April 2009
Onyxmeth said:

Wow. This may be the first time somebody has misunderstood themselves. Either that or the hamster stopped running inside the wheel.

You must be a joke account sir. Don't worry. I'll find out.

 

Sir?  Don't you mean madame?

 



XxXProphecyXxX on 13 April 2009
ElectronicRocker said:
Gh0st4lifE said:
PS3 - > Promises everything, delivers less than competition -> Epic Fail

X360 -> Promises what it should -> delivers what it should -> Epic win

 

Playstation 3

2009 Metacritic:

MLB The Show 09 90%

Killzone 2 92%

Flower 88%

Demons Souls ??? (but according to early reviews and previews it should be in the mid 80s range)

 

next 85%+ exclusives should be infamous in may

Xbox 360

2009 Metacritic:

Halo Wars 82%

Ninja Blade 67%

Star Ocean 4: 79%

Race Pro 75%

Next 85% exclusives should be Halo:ODST or Splinet Cell: conviction in Q3-4

"Underpromise and overdeliver"

LOL

LMAO!!!! GW dude!!

 



Jeronimo66 on 13 April 2009

saimcheeda

As we all know that Playstation 3’s this year exclusive line-up is great and is already helping Sony get some decent sales, But Microsoft seems to be doing nothing in order to get their share from that $47 Billion there is no exclusive that is sure to make a splash this year.

........and what is Halo 3: ODST?



Around the Network
Mark5623 on 13 April 2009

Basically MS thinks the 360 can outsell PS3 in 2009 without any exclusives.

So how is it giving up when they are actually laughing in Sonys face by saying "All we need is Halo Wars and Halo ODST and well sell more then you".



Agamemnon862 on 13 April 2009

Hmm if I remember correctly people were saying the same thing in early-mid 2008. Then the holiday came and MS blew Sony away.



iron_megalith on 13 April 2009

THEY HAVE.... That's damn impossible.... Otherwise I'd be selling this box right now.



XxXProphecyXxX on 13 April 2009
Agamemnon862 said:

Hmm if I remember correctly people were saying the same thing in early-mid 2008. Then the holiday came and MS blew Sony away.

 

really?? W.O.W



jellyfishprince on 13 April 2009
gergroy said:
jellyfishprince said:
Onyxmeth said:
jellyfishprince said:
gergroy said:
jellyfishprince said:
seriously I dont even consider xbox360 to be in this generation race I believe it is only between wii and ps3 but lets face it lol there is no way the ps3 could win. the xbox360 is basically a overpriced wii minus motion control and I was reading that it can play hd-dvd but hd-dvd lost the war so why dont they remove it on new console maybe save some $$$?

I forget how xbox did last generation but didnt they only sell like 10 million console? gamecube sold like 5x that.

wow, how did you make it past the home page?  and you have posted 139 times?  amazing!

 

why are people so men to me on this website? so xbox sold 20 million that isn't that far off from my guess consider ps2 sold 100 million ok

 

It's because...

1. You don't consider 360 to be a part of this generation, which is just...laughable

2. You think the 360 is an overpriced Wii without motion controls, when all the people with eyesight realize 360 and PS3 are pretty close specs wise

3. You think the 360 plays HD-DVDs which it doesn't, and that makes your suggestion of removing the HD-DVD drive especially hilarious

4. You thought the Xbox sold 10 million

5. You thought the Gamecube sold 50 million

The best part was, there wasn't a single sentence in your post that didn't contain some form of lie or completely wrong observation.

 

1. i said it terms of competition

2. does it cost more than a wii? yes. does it not have motion controls? yes. your point? seriously can you read..

3. the hd-dvd drive WAS available for xbox360 many people did not know that but it existed. like i said if microsoft removed such drive from selling they would not have lost money

3. my mistake? wasnt far off from 20 million

5. 5 more of 25 million is gamecube which is correct

 

everything I said was correct it just shows nintendo fans like me are right but other fanboys do not read an djust jump in

 

wow, I was feeling bad for you because I thought you might of said some stuff, but realized you were wrong, but nope.  Again, everything you said here is also wrong.

1 360 is beating the ps3, so that doesn't make sense

2. it costs less and costs more.  However, it has hd graphics too, so it should cost more.

3. As an external drive only, it was never built in

4. again 20 million is incorrect, it was 25 million

5. nope, gamecube was 20 million

just goes to show you that some nintendo fans aren't right and just don't bother to read at all:)

1. not true.. xbox360 sold 5 mil more? but over 50% of xbox broke so more like xbox only old 10million pls get your facts straight

2. what are you even talking about

3. i know that is what I said

4. ??

5. are you serious? did you not read what I said??

please my SON read before you talk to your father like that

 




prediction: wii to sell 150million console by end of 2010