AussieGecko said:
Zucas said: Yea does anyone really want them back. They can sell Nintendo their properties such as Perfect Dark, Banjo Kazooie, and Killer Instinct. Otherwise, the Rare MS owns is not the Rare Nintendo used to own. So really, other than saving a few IPs from further annihilation, what is the point of getting the actual company. |
Okay you are going to slam Rare for a single Banjo game, that they decided to do different, they didnt even call it Banjo 3, so thus it isnt.
They wanted a spin off and i think it is a decent game.
Perfect Dark Zero was pretty good on the Xbox, also are you sure Nintendo owned Rare, i am pretty sure they just made a lot of their games, dont think Nintendo would let a company like Rare go, if they did games such as Banjo, Donkey Kong etc.
|
Oh you poor souls who try to defend Rare now. If only you had played Donkey Kong Country, Killer Instinct, Perfect Dark, Godleneye 007, Banjo 1 and 2, etc. Then you would know exactly how a lot of us feel. And if ya have played them and your still saying this, then I smell bias.
Am I sure Ninty owned Rare? Wow convo should have stopped there. Go look it up... you have the abilities. You should find Ninty had a plurality of ownership with Rare and an exclusive publishing agreement. Closest thing to actually owning them. Tell me when ya find that and then you may resume your argument.
All I've ever said is Rare back when Ninty had them and Rare when MS have them are not the same company. It has nothing to do with who owns them. Just look at the change of people.