By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony Discussion - PSU: "CryEngine 3 vs. Unreal Engine 3 Comparison."

I prefer Halo 3 water, seriously. A year and a half have passed and it's still incredible, pretty cinematographic. About the engines, I'm quite excited about when the first PS360 game using Crytek's engine is released, it looks awesome



Around the Network
alzberto said:
I prefer Halo 3 water, seriously. A year and a half have passed and it's still incredible, pretty cinematographic. About the engines, I'm quite excited about when the first PS360 game using Crytek's engine is released, it looks awesome

 

Seriously? Halo looks like garbage.



The Halo francise is the most overrated bland game to ever hit the console market. It provides a bad name to all FPS that even showed effort at creating an original entertaining plot.

I probably have more ps3 games than you :/ 

CaseyDDR said:
alzberto said:
I prefer Halo 3 water, seriously. A year and a half have passed and it's still incredible, pretty cinematographic. About the engines, I'm quite excited about when the first PS360 game using Crytek's engine is released, it looks awesome

 

Seriously? Halo looks like garbage.

Seriously Halo 3 does what no game on PS3 has done yet.

 



Garnett said:
CaseyDDR said:
alzberto said:
I prefer Halo 3 water, seriously. A year and a half have passed and it's still incredible, pretty cinematographic. About the engines, I'm quite excited about when the first PS360 game using Crytek's engine is released, it looks awesome

 

Seriously? Halo looks like garbage.

Seriously Halo 3 does what no game on PS3 has done yet.

 

What's that?  Graphically I mean?  Its a fantastic online experience and an enjoyable SP title, but every Halo title, including 3 I'd argue, has lagged behind the top FPS engines IMHO.  Graphics have never been the core driver for Halo in my view nor the core focus for Bungie development.

 



Try to be reasonable... its easier than you think...

Reasonable said:
Garnett said:
CaseyDDR said:
alzberto said:
I prefer Halo 3 water, seriously. A year and a half have passed and it's still incredible, pretty cinematographic. About the engines, I'm quite excited about when the first PS360 game using Crytek's engine is released, it looks awesome

 

Seriously? Halo looks like garbage.

Seriously Halo 3 does what no game on PS3 has done yet.

 

What's that?  Graphically I mean?  Its a fantastic online experience and an enjoyable SP title, but every Halo title, including 3 I'd argue, has lagged behind the top FPS engines IMHO.  Graphics have never been the core driver for Halo in my view nor the core focus for Bungie development.

 

Not graphics,Gameplay wise,Its an old engine its showing its age.

 



Around the Network

Not really a fair comparison... the UE3 is kinda dated...



4 ≈ One

Garnett said:
Reasonable said:
Garnett said:
CaseyDDR said:
alzberto said:
I prefer Halo 3 water, seriously. A year and a half have passed and it's still incredible, pretty cinematographic. About the engines, I'm quite excited about when the first PS360 game using Crytek's engine is released, it looks awesome

 

Seriously? Halo looks like garbage.

Seriously Halo 3 does what no game on PS3 has done yet.

 

What's that? Graphically I mean? Its a fantastic online experience and an enjoyable SP title, but every Halo title, including 3 I'd argue, has lagged behind the top FPS engines IMHO. Graphics have never been the core driver for Halo in my view nor the core focus for Bungie development.

 

Not graphics,Gameplay wise,Its an old engine its showing its age.

 

I'd agree - but this topic is about the engine underlying the game.  The Halo engine does the job but has never equalled the Unreal, Crytek or other engines technically - IMHO of course!

 

 



Try to be reasonable... its easier than you think...

Reasonable said:
Garnett said:
Reasonable said:
Garnett said:
CaseyDDR said:
alzberto said:
I prefer Halo 3 water, seriously. A year and a half have passed and it's still incredible, pretty cinematographic. About the engines, I'm quite excited about when the first PS360 game using Crytek's engine is released, it looks awesome

 

Seriously? Halo looks like garbage.

Seriously Halo 3 does what no game on PS3 has done yet.

 

What's that? Graphically I mean? Its a fantastic online experience and an enjoyable SP title, but every Halo title, including 3 I'd argue, has lagged behind the top FPS engines IMHO. Graphics have never been the core driver for Halo in my view nor the core focus for Bungie development.

 

Not graphics,Gameplay wise,Its an old engine its showing its age.

 

I'd agree - but this topic is about the engine underlying the game.  The Halo engine does the job but has never equalled the Unreal, Crytek or other engines technically - IMHO of course!

 

 

http://forum.beyond3d.com/showthread.php?t=53955

This thread offers additional insight if you're interested.

 



Tease.

Thanks. Interesting read.

One thing I'd always defend about Bungie is that they always focus on the game and aren't out to have better graphics just for the sake of it.

Still, it's clear that technically other engines equal and surpass the Halo engine - it's a pity that too often they are locked beneath bland and generic titles.



Try to be reasonable... its easier than you think...

Reasonable said:
Thanks. Interesting read.

One thing I'd always defend about Bungie is that they always focus on the game and aren't out to have better graphics just for the sake of it.

Still, it's clear that technically other engines equal and surpass the Halo engine - it's a pity that too often they are locked beneath bland and generic titles.

 

Np, but since when it halo "NOT" generic?