Kasz216 said:
MontanaHatchet said: What's with all the Hitler defenders? He may have had twisted ideas, that doesn't change the fact that he's an asshole. |
I don't think it's hitler defense so much as an overreaction to how underrated Stalin was as an evil prick.
Hitler is constantly deemed the evilest person ever when he wasn't even the evilist person of his era.
|
I still think that Hitler beats Stalin, by a country mile.
Stalin had a bigger body count? Stalin had more time.
Hitler moved the world (which was bent on securing peace after the horrors of WWI) into the biggest war it's ever yet seen. He was so evil, he couldn't last--the destruction he created wound up swallowing him and his country whole. Later speculation aside, Stalin died in bed from natural causes.
Hitler had an ideology? He had grand plans, and these are supposed to somehow lessen his evilness? His ideology and his plans involved exterminating incredible swaths of the world's population. Way more evil than Stalin's simple drive to protect himself against his imagined enemies.
Stalin at his most ambitious sucked up the Nazi wreckage of Eastern Europe into the Warsaw Pact, basically a military buffer zone. He was more a nationalist than an internationalist, and to my knowledge, he never had any real plans of any kind of "world conquest."
Hitler? Had to be stopped. If he hadn't be stopped, by force, he wouldn't have stopped himself.
Finally, Hitler proved his evil over Stalin directly: the two leaders were allied for a time and, of course, one eventually betrayed the other. Hitler got there first; even bat-shit paranoid Stalin was more loyal.
There may have been men more evil than even Hitler... but I'm not sure that any of them have ever been in the position to prove it. Both Hitler and Stalin were incredibly evil, almost so much as to redefine the concept, but Hitler, who was so destructive as to inspire Churchill to work with Stalin, trumps his Russian adversary.