By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Website Topics - Who else doesn't give a hoot about VG Chartz game ratings?

Torillian said:

Game's value is based upon the norms of the genre.  A 30 hour JRPG with no other replay value is not going to score more than a 10 hour FPS because the norms of the two genres are different.  Just the same way that JRPG's are not looked at for online multiplayer while FPS's are. 

 

And I fail to see how Presentation is dominated by Japanese games, I'll have to admit you lost me on that one.

 

Then may i ask why God of War PSP only recieved a 6.0 in value? As for presentation, I still don't get what VGchartz considers presentation to be. I always thought it was how the game was presented like the games style and just the little things like awesome boss music that fits the situation, for example; things like creativity and level design and attention to detail. This is often were Japanese games thrive.

 



I am Washu-bot B, loyal servant of Final-Fan, the greatest scientific genius in the universe!


Around the Network

GoW got a 6.0 because it is short even for an adventure game, has little replay value, and Max didn't think it was worth a second playthrough.

Read above for what Presentation is about.



...

Torillian said:
GoW got a 6.0 because it is short even for an adventure game, has little replay value, and Max didn't think it was worth a second playthrough.

Read above for what Presentation is about.

 

 *Cracks knuckles * Please tell me you mean Gears not God.

*EDIT* PSP OK . Its still a bad score



@nordlead: I agree, it also undoubtedly has something to do with the quality of those hours spent. That's why the category isn't just "length".

@Riot: I think that Presentation doesn't favor Japanese games, really, since it's a conglomeration of style, graphics, sound, and what have you. Value certainly doesn't - if it were just length, WRPGs would conquer the universe.



Different genres.

VGChartz has no need for bias here, especially when the reviewers aren't always the same people. They are legitimacy in the purest form to me. I agree with them all.



Leatherhat on July 6th, 2012 3pm. Vita sales:"3 mil for COD 2 mil for AC. Maybe more. "  thehusbo on July 6th, 2012 5pm. Vita sales:"5 mil for COD 2.2 mil for AC."

Around the Network
SaviorX said:
Different genres.

VGChartz has no need for bias here, especially when the reviewers aren't always the same people. They are legitimacy in the purest form to me. I agree with them all.

 

 I Fed-Exed you a cookie.  It should be arriving within the hour.



Could I trouble you for some maple syrup to go with the plate of roffles you just served up?

Tag, courtesy of fkusumot: "Why do most of the PS3 fanboys have avatars that looks totally pissed?"
"Ok, girl's trapped in the elevator, and the power's off.  I swear, if a zombie comes around the next corner..."

I just like reading other people's opinions. Sometimes, flaws that one reviewer will complain about don't bother me. Other times, something they'll barely mention will intrigue me and convince me to buy a game. It's all about thhe text, not the score. VGChartz reviews are pretty well written. The only downside is that I usually already own the game by the time it gets reviewed!!



yeah they cant review for shit here can they....



I stay away from the reviews on this site. Metacritic or nothing...



Not a 360 fanboy, just a PS3 fanboy hater that likes putting them in their place ^.^

shinyuhadouken said:
I stay away from the reviews on this site. Metacritic or nothing...

I can respect people who just don't like the reviews, but come on. Really? You're actually subscribing to the Hive's newsletter?