Shambolic said: MrMarc - It's interesting you see the fact that it is fashionable as a drawback. One thing I really like about Apple is that they make all of their products really good looking.
For some reason most electronic devices are really quite ugly, they just don't bother to design them, and I can see no excuse for that. The fact that Apple took the effort to make the ipod attractive is a real positive, if you think it has made them just a fashion accessory then so be it but it's better than just making an ugly product.
Also the scroll wheel rocks! |
I'm certianly not disagreeing with you there at all, iPods are great to the eye, but maybe I should've defined a little bit what I meant by 'fashion item'. It's the one thing everybody wants, and so they will pay through the teeth to get one because everybody else has one as well. I see that as an encouragement to Apple to continue making the products the way that they do.
iPods do look nice, but there are far better MP3 players out there which are far better value for money, iPods don't offer value for money at all. Storage and battery life are the two things which should be the major selling points of ANY MP3 player, iPods just aren't great in either of these respects.
iPod Nano 8GB for roughly £130-140 brand new or a Creative Zen Touch 20GB with a confirmed 20+ hours battery life for £140... it's an old MP3 player yeah and it's bulky but why should I care what it looks like, I only want to listen to as much music as I can...
http://www.apple.com/uk/ipod/whichipod/ - Look at those prices for the Shuffle and Nano, why would you even want to pay so much for so little? The classic model shows 'some' value but the new Touch model is ridiculous and tbh, if anyone buys one, they have more money than sense.