First of all, this is MY opinion, right? OK let's go ...

Well, the title says everything, mediocre games should get a mediocre score and when I see dead rising wii getting almost 8, or afro samurai gettin almost 6, well, that's BS imo.

Then illogical, I won't make a liste, I'd just say: chrono trigger: 8,8, FFIV: 9,0 ...

Would be cool if reviewers could be a little more hard, cause I don't understand why reviewing games if it's to give all of them 7+ ...

Wait, wait, wait, wait.

Wait.

Wait.

....You think Chrono Trigger isn't worth an 8.8? And FFIV shouldn't get a 9?

What wasn't hard about those reviews?

Illogical, chrono trigger is better than FFIV by far. Chrono trigger deserves 8,8 but FFIV doesn't even deserve 8 imo.

And WTF at revenant wings: 8,8???
Mirror's edge: 8+

RLY, that's insane!

Well, you're free to disagree, I guess.

Just, uh.

Whenever my first review gets put up

You might not want to read that one either

It's not about the reviewer, RLY, but when I see:

DQIV: 8... (so FFIV better than DQIV...)
Tenchu wii: almost 8

Sorry but that's really really weird.

No, they're not opinions, they're reviews. I don't want opinions in reviews...

You can't expect much consistency with so many different people contributing reviews.
And then there's people like Maxwell, who should never have been allowed to review games in the first place :P

That's basically what reviews are: opinion piecs framed in such a way as to inform people about what they can expect.

Scores are not the entirety and body of reviews. The text is more important.

Is there a way to browse reviews by reviewers???

What? What exactly are Reviews then?