By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony Discussion - New PS3 exclusive Katamari game in the works

deathgod33 said:
omg so many ps3 exclusives coming i cant even count them

I know, the past couple of weeks has been crazy.



Around the Network

not even E3 yet yay



PLAYSTATION®3 is the future......NOW.......B_E_L_I_E_V_E

badgenome said:
deathgod33 said:
omg so many ps3 exclusives coming i cant even count them

I know, the past couple of weeks has been crazy.

 

and people  keep writing articles that It s a genesis or game cube.

 

 



 

 

 

Is that article talking about Katamari Damacy TRIBUTE?

If so, meh.

Katamari Damacy is a fun game, but I don't know if I really need to pay for it again (and full price) and how much would HD visuals really add to the game?



I guess someone forgot to tell Takahashi that there aren't anymore 3rd party exclusives for the PS3.



Around the Network

I could be totally off, but the name seems to imply it might be a remake of the original in 1080P. In any case, awesome news for Katamari fans. Hopefully the team can still deliver. The last Katamari game wasn't as well received critically.



Tag: Became a freaking mod and a complete douche, coincidentally, at the same time.



Why cand Namco make a Tales game for ps3 aswell



 

CGI-Quality said:
WoW PS3, where did these exclusives come from, my goodness!!! This great, 2009 is looking brighter, indeed!

My motto:
Exclusives>>>>>>>Multiplatform

@bolded: Why's that?

 



Tag: Became a freaking mod and a complete douche, coincidentally, at the same time.



CGI-Quality said:
@ Onyxmeth

What's the sense in multiple consoles if every console has all the same games. Beyond that, exclusives should take advantage of a said console, which IMO, is better for the gamer. It's my opinion though, not any gsct to it. I just prefer exclusives....

Gears of War
Killzone 2
Uncharted
Halo 3

These are examples of GREAT exclusives. The industry was built on what each console had exclusive under it's belt, be it peripheral, games, features. When consoles share these things, it's silly. Then there's less room for differentiation, hence why the PS3 & 360, though drastically different, are dubbed the "HD Twins"

While the awesome Wii has little - no trouble differentiating itself. It's another big reason I LOVE the Wii, I know it's an experience all by itself...

Ok, but each of those games (minus maybe Killzone 2) could be duplicated on the other console. Also it should be obvious from past efforts that Katamari won't be a power hungry game, so it's exclusivity really bares no weight on it's inherent quality. I also noticed on a personal level that many of this gen's best games are multiplatform anyways. Ultimately those two consoles may house different tech, but the end result is remarkably similiar to where exclusives are almost nothing more than a means to attract customers. From the standpoint of someone that already owns both consoles, why wouldn't you want the option to pick your favorite version of each formely exclusive game to get? Even if some turned out grossly underperforming on one console or another, it's still good to have choice in the matter.

 



Tag: Became a freaking mod and a complete douche, coincidentally, at the same time.



CGI-Quality said:
Duplicating a game with a different game trying to be like it is one thing. Just multiplating is another. People compare this gen to the 16-bit gen often. One HUUUUUUGEEEEEE difference though. Sega did their own thing - Sonic, Streets of Rage, etc..... and Nintendo - Mario, Zelda, Metroid etc, etc..... This gen, a lot of the time it's: "oh PS3 has better textures in Far Cry 2 than the 360"...again not a comparison of two franchises but of the same game.

Sure, costly game development coupled with a crippled economy hasn't helped, but I'm saying it's one the things wrong with this gen. If Nintendo and Sega had just shared libraries well then the 16-bit era wouldn't have been as legendary as it turned out to be...

So you're implying that because these sets of consoles have the lowest rate of exclusives since possibly the first generation, that this can't be a legendary generation? I'm of the mind that if Sega and Nintendo had shared more exclusives then each console would in turn have more games. I don't see the losing situation in that as a gamer. I only understand what's wrong with it in terms of the industry keeping hardware competition going.

If you really think long and hard about it, how many exclusives on either console really couldn't be duplicated on the other with little to no loss in quality? Maybe one or two per console. That is what I'm mainly talking about because you brought this up in a topic about Katamari and said something that implied that it will be a better game simply because it's exclusive. We all know the history of Katamari and how it is not a power hungry series. There's no reason to think it'll start now. So what would be the difference in quality had this been multiplatform? My guess? Nada.

 



Tag: Became a freaking mod and a complete douche, coincidentally, at the same time.