By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General Discussion - Are You A Terrorist?

Well, if you happen to be an American who disagrees or speaks out against government policies in the U.S, then you are!

Ter·ror·ist (noun): Anyone Who Disagrees with the Government

 

George Washington’s Blog
Saturday, March 21, 2009

The Department of Homeland Security and police forces label anyone who they disagree with - or who disagrees with government policies - as “terrorists”.

Don’t believe me?

Well, according to a law school professor, pursuant to the Military Commissions Act, “Anyone who … speaks out against the government’s policies could be declared an ‘unlawful enemy combatant’ and imprisoned indefinitely. That includes American citizens.”

And according to an FBI memo, peace protesters are being labeled as “terrorists”. Indeed, police have been terrorizing children, little old ladies and other “dangerous” people who attempted to peacefully protest.

And a 2003 FBI memo describes protesters’ use of videotaping as an “intimidation” technique, even though - as the ACLU points out - “Most mainstream demonstrators often use videotape during protests to document law enforcement activity and, more importantly, deter police from acting outside the law.” The FBI appears to be objecting to the use of cameras to document unlawful behavior by law enforcement itself.

And the Internet has been labeled as a breeding ground for terrorists, with anyone who questions the government’s versions of history being especially equated with terrorists.

Now, the state of Missouri has labeled as terrorists current Congressman Ron Paul and his supporters, former Congressman Bob Barr, libertarians in general, anyone who holds gold, and a host of other people.

In other words, anyone who disagrees with the “acceptable” way of looking at things is a terrorist.

How is this different from Stalin or Mao’s use of labels such as “enemy of the state”?

http://www.prisonplanet.com/ter%c2%b7ror%c2%b7ist-noun-anyone-who-disagrees-with-the-government.html



" Rebellion Against Tyrants Is Obedience To God"

Around the Network

I guess I am.




Nintendo still doomed?
Feel free to add me on 3DS or Switch! (PM me if you do ^-^)
Nintendo ID: Mako91                  3DS code: 4167-4543-6089

under that definition, technically im an incredibly dangerous terrorist, i disagree with the government on lots of things, lol

Im In The UK, this is almost policy here aswel it seems at times



Well... I agree with... some of the governments policies.
So what about all the democrats who were against the Iraq war a few years ago? Does that make John Kerry circa 2004 a terrorist? Your definition seems a little vague.



Hawkeye said:
Well... I agree with... some of the governments policies.
So what about all the democrats who were against the Iraq war a few years ago? Does that make John Kerry circa 2004 a terrorist? Your definition seems a little vague.

 

 It's not my definition. I Just posted the article. click the links to read the documents.



" Rebellion Against Tyrants Is Obedience To God"

Around the Network

And the Internet has been labeled as a breeding ground for terrorists, with anyone who questions the government’s versions of history being especially equated with terrorists.


I've heard this a lot. You know, I wonder if some day the internet will have strict regulations in place. Monitoring, fees, maybe a government 'content filter' so to speak.

Anyway, getting back to the OT, yeah, I'm definitely a terrorist by their standards. Looks like I join the likes of Ron Paul. Not too shabby!



Person 1: Does Valkyria Chronicles have trophies?
Person 2:  No.
Person 1: Forget it. I'm not buying it.
Person 2: Wait! It's amazing! Unique, charming, drop dead gorgeous... Hello?

Yeah. I'm definitely a terrorist.

Alex Jones is kind of a nutjob, IMO. And coincidentally the U.S. Attorney's Office has stopped using the term "enemy combatant". These conspiracy theorists need to catch up with the lies and fabrications being thrust upon them by the Obama adminstration. Aren't they supposed to be ahead of where the administration is going? Why are they using the old terminology? Fucking amateurs.



We had two bags of grass, seventy-five pellets of mescaline, five sheets of high-powered blotter acid, a salt shaker half full of cocaine, a whole galaxy of multi-colored uppers, downers, screamers, laughers…Also a quart of tequila, a quart of rum, a case of beer, a pint of raw ether and two dozen amyls.  The only thing that really worried me was the ether.  There is nothing in the world more helpless and irresponsible and depraved than a man in the depths of an ether binge. –Raoul Duke

It is hard to shed anything but crocodile tears over White House speechwriter Patrick Buchanan's tragic analysis of the Nixon debacle. "It's like Sisyphus," he said. "We rolled the rock all the way up the mountain...and it rolled right back down on us...."  Neither Sisyphus nor the commander of the Light Brigade nor Pat Buchanan had the time or any real inclination to question what they were doing...a martyr, to the bitter end, to a "flawed" cause and a narrow, atavistic concept of conservative politics that has done more damage to itself and the country in less than six years than its liberal enemies could have done in two or three decades. -Hunter S. Thompson

Yep I'm a terrorist. Lock me up before I blow something up in a pacifist rage.



Hell no I am a neocon.



I think anyone who socialises with Muslims/Arabians would have been considered a terrorist during bushs reign, in which case I was a terrorist.