LOL!

Well, this was a failed attempt at being innovative.

Well yeah, just how a game that's set in WW2 will likely get higher ratings then a game set in the Spanish American War if the games were almost exactly the same but had different graphics to reflect it as such.

 Starwars >>>> Generic Dragons when it comes to franchises.

Just how if someone released a game exactly like Pokemon it wouldn't sell or review half as well as pokemon.

 Sorry but why   Folklore = non game?

Edit my mistake, I read it wrong.

In fact I love Folklore ^__¨;  

Ouch, sounds like they should have spent more time on the Sixaxis and less on the RSX.

 THANK YOU. I'm glad to see there's actually someone who knows this. Everyone else is just inventing arbitrary definitions based on reviews.

i could have sworn the digimon games sold decently...

How do you know if a Spanish American war game would be rated low.. it probably hasnt been done.. just like a revolutionary war game, or civil war game. 

I think the game probably would have been recieved better on loose rails, like Star Fox. It would have allowed for masked crappy controls and more time on use the fantastic graphics for better presentation.

I'm pretty sure he's not saying that he thinks Sixaxis sucks just that he loves alliteration.

factor 5 has always had simple and/or mediocre gameplay. They need to work on making deeper, more involving gameplay. Great graphics and sound is simply not enough.

 Were they being innovative? Everyone makes fun of it for essentially being a dragon version of their previous games (or mention Panzer Dragoon) and the six axis for flying has been around for awhile.