The cover system in Killzone 2 is the best in any FPS IMO.

but the aim system is the worst in any fps i have ever played...

Honestly I'm a owner of a PS3 but I'm already sick of this "Killcrap" threads

No it isn't.

The aiming in KZ2 is much more realistic than any other shooter. It requires skill to be good at, because you have to anticipate the recoil of the gun and make allowances for that when you go after someone. KZ2 requires skill, unlike CoD4, CoD:WaW, whereby you point the gun at someone and there is no effect of the gun firing to the player, making it incredibly easy to be good at.

Amen,..

Maybe if you were good at games you wouldn't think this...

If you mean a single player campaign that looks about as good, probably in a few years there will be a similar looking 360 game. The real difference isn't frame by frame graphics, the 360 probably can render a similar looking frame with some more optimization.

As to the scale, that the 360 probably cannot do. In terms of maintaining that level of graphical fidelity in giant single player engagements much less multiplayer with more then 16 people, that would probably be too much for the 360. I mean does anyone really think that the Halo 3, Gears and other devs didn't want to have 32 person multiplayer? I mean with vehicles and all that wasn't Halo in particularly calling out for 16 person teams?

The 360 can handle frame by frame graphics of the PS3, what it probably can't handle is large scale multiplayer with the same kind of graphics. I have yet to see a high quality 360 game with 32 person games much less 40 (like resistance had at release), 60 (what resistance 2 can do) or 256 (like MAG will have). This is probably because of the 8 processor vs 3 processor system. When you have 8 cores to work with you can toss all the things required to make a 256 game work to other cores, but if you only have 3 there really isn't a whole lot of room for expansion (unless you make the cores faster, which really isn't an option since the clock speed was set in stone for both consoles a few years ago).

Well graphics arn't everything but they are something and of course game play is what really matters. In the PS2 era, the Xbox and PS2 seemed pretty evenly matched in terms of graphics, of course Xbox had the edge seeing as it was more powerful but the games it produced never showed this to the extent of what it should have. However games such as GOW 1 and GOW 2 pushed the graphics beyond what was thought possible on PS2 and i personally talked about the graphics and gameplay, not just one, so u will have to ask someone else to answer that because i dont want to answer for them, sorry.

I'm sorry, but that is his opinion. You cannot change it. COD4 required skill and the majority of people who played the game either liked it on PC or the 360. It's exactly the same reason I never SFIV on the 360, because the controller is just that much better on the PS3. COD4 did require skill.

 you has  all Reason,thit ''guy'' need help,..

enjoy the games megaman.

enjoy the game consoles megaman,

enjoy the live megaman.