Quantcast
The price of a next gen title screen - RE 5 is 7-8 hours long

Forums - Gaming Discussion - The price of a next gen title screen - RE 5 is 7-8 hours long

7-8 hours? meh i remember beating RE 1-3 at much shorter times



Around the Network

The thread title made me lol :p
7-8 hours for a $60 game is really sad :(



I dont mind the short playthrough time. RE games have always been short after the the first run through. The thing that botters me if if this is the estimated time for the first run through, since usually its roughly 15 -20 hours for me to play a game through like RE the first time and than on the second or third i can usually complete the game in a fraction of time, but for a 7-8 hour estimed first run through is kinda a let down.



I TAKE NO SIDES

arsenal009 said:
The thread title made me lol :p
7-8 hours for a $60 game is really sad :(

 

Broadstrokes, claiming the worth of a game is based only on its dollar per hour quotent is about as basically uninformed and incorrect as you get. Thinking.

I paid 60 dollars for CoD4. It had a 4 hour campaign. I never played it online, and it was one of the greatest gaming purchases of my life. Same for games like 10 hour Phoenix Wrights, 4 hour Elite Beat Agents, 6 hour Gears of War, or 3 hour Guitar Heros.

Harshly, ignorantly, and incorrectly judging books by their cover, simply because you don't care about them, one way or another, is very, very common, unfortunately. What I'm trying to get across to you here is that you are wrong in more than a few ways, with your last comment, and you should be ashamed of it, however you probably won't be, because things that other people also do, don't make us as ashamed as they should.



I don't need your console war.
It feeds the rich while it buries the poor.
You're power hungry, spinnin' stories, and bein' graphics whores.
I don't need your console war.

NO NO, NO NO NO.

Soriku said:
Dead Rising is $50 mil? Link?

Btw, Mikami is working on an unannounced game with Sega and also that other game with Suda, so don't be too sad :)

 

Are those games on the Wii?



Around the Network

Thats what happens you need to fit the game into 6GB DVD. It wouldnt be as bad though if they actually got the controls right. The DEMO was unplayable. Horrible controls. It looks nice, but plays pretty bad.



arsenal009 said:
Soriku said:
Dead Rising is $50 mil? Link?

Btw, Mikami is working on an unannounced game with Sega and also that other game with Suda, so don't be too sad :)

 

Are those games on the Wii?

 

The one with Suda is Wii/PS3/360 and I think PC but not sure. The one with Sega we know absolutely nothing about.




Onyxmeth said:
ItsaMii said:
Onyxmeth said:

Resident Evil 3 is the worst Resident Evil? Seriously? You'd think the original has aged worse than 3 did.

 

I don`t get it. Are trying to make a point or just object to my claims? Goldeneye did not age well at all. Even so, try telling someone that played Goldeneye at its released time that Rogue Agent or Quantum of Solace is much better.

RE 3 was shoter than any other in the series, had no option for a second character and did not have good replay value (epilogues and costumes are not enough to make you play through the game again). The plot was more of a side story. Nemesis was a crappy idea for a boss/enemy. He was more annoying than scary. You knew he was coming. The Tyrant from RE 2 was much better.

Most of your complaints just described Code Veronica, which came on more powerful hardware and a year later. So again, why is RE3 the worst? Plus, most people love Nemesis as an enemy. He makes a lot of top 10 lists of villains. I wouldn't even be bringing this up but you seemed to present "RE3 as worst ever" as basic fact, which it isn't.

Also about your Goldeneye example, those other games came on more powerful consoles and that has aided them in being better. Name me a James Bond game on 5th gen hardware that is better than Goldeneye.

 

 

Translation: I am just disagreeing with you for the sake of disagreeing. I have no idea what you are disagreeing with. RE 3 is the worst in the series. Well, unless you count Gun Survivor and other spin offs as part of the series. Choose your standard: Metacritic, user reviews, fan opinions, number of remakes. RE 3 is the worst. That is the closest to fact that you will ever get (considering tastes are subjective). I would like to add that I did not say that my opinions are facts, but I will say that my opinions are worth more than yours especially when it comes to RE series. Get over it.

Your James Bond arguments are confusing. Why are you mixing stuff like different console generations? All I said is that aging better is not a good measure to game quality. Bad games may age better than great classics. That is why Goldeneye is better than any other 007 game. It was amazing and revolutionary when it came out, not more of the same generic crap.



Satan said:

"You are for ever angry, all you care about is intelligence, but I repeat again that I would give away all this superstellar life, all the ranks and honours, simply to be transformed into the soul of a merchant's wife weighing eighteen stone and set candles at God's shrine."

Funny. Reading your OP and really thinking about your comments and others I have read suddenly make me feel overall better that it didn't come to Wii. Because RE4Wii Edition sounds like it blows it away AND I have the Wiimote to play it with. :)

/superchunk: fanboy edition



darendt said:
Thats what happens you need to fit the game into 6GB DVD. It wouldnt be as bad though if they actually got the controls right. The DEMO was unplayable. Horrible controls. It looks nice, but plays pretty bad.

 

RE4 has great controls & it fits into less than 6GB DVD  :o

 

@soriku

Thanks for info  :)