omgwtfbbq said:
errr sorry, but those games you mentioned were not the first camera games, karaoke games or quiz games. They just advertised them better |
Well they were the first that reached the mass market
omgwtfbbq said:
errr sorry, but those games you mentioned were not the first camera games, karaoke games or quiz games. They just advertised them better |
Well they were the first that reached the mass market
uhh.. I think you missed VALVe ;)
Bet With routsounmanman: By the end of Q1 2008 Capcom WONT have announced a RE5 Wii Edition OR a new RE (classic gameplay) for the Wii (WON)
Almost nothing about that list or the reasons given have anything to do with being innovative.
Seihyouken said: Almost nothing about that list or the reasons given have anything to do with being innovative. |
This
Staude said: lol i think the title of this article is off a bit.. and if not, then the content is. How can you be innovative for outselling someone else ? lol |
Great point! Falls off the list...
How the hell can Ubisoft make the list when all they've ever done is copy Nintendo?
Munkeh111 said:
Well they were the first that reached the mass market |
They sure were, but that doesn't make them innovative. That makes them successful =)
Help! I'm stuck in a forum signature!
How the hell is Gears of War 2 innovative? I think they put the wrong title. Anyway, ACTUAL innovative companies:
Media Molecule. LBP dared to be different and succeeded.
Nintendo. Come on, just look at the Wii. Nintendo created the analog stick. They are the oldest company, yet they always bring the most innovation to the table. They failed to do this with the GameCube, and the GameCube failed.
Team ICO. Not sure if they count as a company, but SoTC was a breath of fresh air.
Loads more, but these three spring to mind. Microsoft are just about the opposite of innovative. Not that that's a bad thing.
Microsoft aren't innovative........just Business Gods