Ah, this fetishization of the score bothers me. Fie on it!
Ah, this fetishization of the score bothers me. Fie on it!
Yes take some of my load people =P though I haven't done a whole lot the past couple of months I wrote my CoD:W@W then had huge work loads and huge computer malfunctions
MaxwellGT2000 - "Does the amount of times you beat it count towards how hardcore you are?"
Wii Friend Code - 5882 9717 7391 0918 (PM me if you add me), PSN - MaxwellGT2000, XBL - BlkKniteCecil, MaxwellGT2000
hm, that could be fun, i got a lot of Wii games, mostly new ones so i could do some reviews but my writing skills are horrible :P
don't mind my username, that was more than 10 years ago, I'm a different person now, amazing how people change ^_^
^^Might not want to say that when you're applying for a writing position...
It would be fun to give it a crack, though as it stands now, I could only review PC titles.
Khuutra said:
I apologize, and will do my best to clarify. What I mean is that we would talk about what a game is about, dissecting it in a way that echoes cinematic and literary criticism. Most video game reviews discuss plot and music and so forth, maybe a charater or two, but they rarely dip into what a game is about on the whole, the subjects that it tackles or the way that it interacts with the player. A critical analysis of Wii Sports would be fascinating and no less deep than a critical analysis of Final Fantasy IV DS or even Knights of the Old Republic II: The Sith Lords, but each of them would be very different because each game sets out to and accomplishes very different things. |
These are consumer reviews, meant to inform people whether or not the game is worth a purchase. Frankly most cinematic/literary criticism doesn't do that job and is just pretentious.
DKII said:
These are consumer reviews, meant to inform people whether or not the game is worth a purchase. Frankly most cinematic/literary criticism doesn't do that job and is just pretentious. |
Oof. That's an argument for another day... but all right, never mind, then.
I didn't expect something in line with how Ebert reviews movies to be rejected out of hand, though.
DKII said:
These are consumer reviews, meant to inform people whether or not the game is worth a purchase. Frankly most cinematic/literary criticism doesn't do that job and is just pretentious. |
Actually, I've had time to think this over, and frankly, sir, that's a load of bull. Most cinematic criticism comes in the form of consumer reviews, and that does nothing but tell people if a movie is worth watching. It just operates according to a critical standard that actually involves criticism, instead of a categorical statement of quality that pretends to something as ludicrous as an objective perspective.
I find your statement ridiculous and worrisome.
Does it matter how long you have been a member of the site? I am an aspiring writer and I have always contemplated starting out as a reviewer. I will send in one or two reviews if you have no objections. I have a fully backwards compatible PS3 so I can do games from any generation of playstation. A Wii and by extension a gamecube. And a PSP. I will acquire a ds shortly.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1gWECYYOSo
Please Watch/Share this video so it gets shown in Hollywood.
Signalstar said: Does it matter how long you have been a member of the site? I am an aspiring writer and I have always contemplated starting out as a reviewer. I will send in one or two reviews if you have no objections. I have a fully backwards compatible PS3 so I can do games from any generation of playstation. A Wii and by extension a gamecube. And a PSP. I will acquire a ds shortly. |
No, that doesn't matter. Obviously it helps if you're already known on the site, but the only thing that really matters is whether you're a good reviewer.
So let the reviews come!