wait does this mean that in the end the 360 is more expensive?.
| Squilliam said: If the PS3 wireless wasn't so terrible I felt forced to use a 10M ethernet cable anyway then yes I would consider it to be worth something. Since I already had the cable for the PS3 I didn't feel bad buying a switch so I could plug the 360 in as well. |
i call bullsh!t... i can walk anywhere in my two story and it works fine
@unkeat - SQUILLIAM posted valid factual links. How is that being a fanboy?
The only people spreading lies and being being fanboys in this thread is Sony and their PR department and it really pisses me off!
NOTE TO SELF: Better to be pissed off than pissed on.
Squilliam said:
Connection drops out, I have 60-70% through a couple of walls (Quite dense). My HTPC gets a strong signal and its right next to it. So yes the connection is terrible, if a usb wireless dongle outperforms it.
|
you know for wireless connections 60+ is considered good right? It is perfect for gaming. Any where lower and you have lag issues.
As for your USB dongle comment, of course it will. Its external for one and your is probably fairly new (guessing).
Tyrannical said:
If it was 2006, there would have been a "backwards compatable" entry. |
You know there's a date on that artical right? I didn't just make that thing up, they pulled this crap two years ago and the internet exploded. It looks like they still haven't learned their lesson.
Say whatever you will about Sony or the PS3, you can't deny that they have had a terrible marketing team for the longest time.
Two can play the Spin game.
Sony: Xbox 360 is $50-100 more expensive.
Squilliam: Xbox 360 outsells the PS3 by 50% inspite of being more expensive. 
Really should have pulled this lulz out earlier.
Tease.
| Squilliam said: Two can play the Spin game. Sony: Xbox 360 is $50-100 more expensive. Squilliam: Xbox 360 outsells the PS3 by 50% inspite of being more expensive. Really should have pulled this lulz out earlier. |
Does that mean a 299.99 PS3 won't work? =P
Why must JRPG female leads suck so bad?
I bought all three console but for some reason it cost me the most when I bought my PS3. Sony better compensate me for this "value" I was supposed to get, I mean, I never ever use the console to play blu-rays! Like, that's $150 or so right there.
And Microsoft, they can just give me a new console because mine is too loud.
Nintendo already gave me a new console because the old one was freezing so they are cool in my book. It's a long book, so nobody read it.
who cares?? i already knew all those, i know the value of the PS3...anyway i am not one of those people that look at the price when going to buy something. PS3 is quality as a product
Quality comes with a high price, same goes for a HDTV, some goes for a laptop or PC.
The mistake sony did was to forget that most of the gamers are kids and moms and dads are buying the consoles. That was the bad move
lol all i need is just the 360, i could buy two for the price of 1 ps3
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2024 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
