By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Kingdom Hearts 3 - Where do you think it's going?

vdoesntforgive said:
Kasz216 said:

1997 is a long time follower of SE?

Try 1987. (like me!)


 

What games were they making in 1987?

 

Final Fantasy and Dragon's Quest.

Square and Enix were my two favorite developers... until they merged oddly.



Around the Network
Kasz216 said:
vdoesntforgive said:
Kasz216 said:

1997 is a long time follower of SE?

Try 1987. (like me!)


 

What games were they making in 1987?

 

Final Fantasy and Dragon's Quest.

Square and Enix were my two favorite developers... until they merged oddly.


Oh, right. I thought they started with VII.

 

vdoesntforgive said:
Kasz216 said:
vdoesntforgive said:
Kasz216 said:

1997 is a long time follower of SE?

Try 1987. (like me!)


 

What games were they making in 1987?

 

Final Fantasy and Dragon's Quest.

Square and Enix were my two favorite developers... until they merged oddly.


 

Oh, right. I thought they started with VII.

No. VII was still under Square.  Hence why 1987 seems to fit.  Since you seen to be using SE as just Square in your remark.

Unless you mean you thought Final Fantasy VII was the first Final Fantasy game...  In which case... no.

Final Fantasy 1 was the game that saved the company.

While Dragon Quest was the game that made RPGs what they are today... made over at Enix.



vdoesntforgive said:
Kasz216 said:
vdoesntforgive said:
Kasz216 said:

1997 is a long time follower of SE?

Try 1987. (like me!)

What games were they making in 1987?

Final Fantasy and Dragon's Quest.

Square and Enix were my two favorite developers... until they merged oddly.


Oh, right. I thought they started with VII.

It says a lot about the state of FF fandom when it took me a moment to realize you were joking.

FFXIIIv runs on Crystal Tools, which runs on all current-gen systems. It already can run on the Wii. It won't be as pretty, but I see it happening.



Kasz216 said:
vdoesntforgive said:
Kasz216 said:
vdoesntforgive said:
Kasz216 said:

1997 is a long time follower of SE?

Try 1987. (like me!)


 

What games were they making in 1987?

 

Final Fantasy and Dragon's Quest.

Square and Enix were my two favorite developers... until they merged oddly.


 

Oh, right. I thought they started with VII.

No. VII was still under Square.  Hence why 1987 seems to fit.  Since you seen to be using SE as just Square in your remark.

Unless you mean you thought Final Fantasy VII was the first Final Fantasy game...  In which case... no.

Final Fantasy 1 was the game that saved the company.

While Dragon Quest was the game that made RPGs what they are today... made over at Enix.


Whoa whoa, slow down. What's the difference between Square and S-E?

 

Around the Network

Never played any of the games but I hope it comes to Wii because… well just for the lolz



    R.I.P Mr Iwata :'(

i think wii simply because think the demographic is there on that console



Monster Hunter Tri

Name: Silver

ID: 94BRVX

vdoesntforgive said:
Kasz216 said:
vdoesntforgive said:
Kasz216 said:
vdoesntforgive said:
Kasz216 said:

1997 is a long time follower of SE?

Try 1987. (like me!)


 

What games were they making in 1987?

 

Final Fantasy and Dragon's Quest.

Square and Enix were my two favorite developers... until they merged oddly.


 

Oh, right. I thought they started with VII.

No. VII was still under Square.  Hence why 1987 seems to fit.  Since you seen to be using SE as just Square in your remark.

Unless you mean you thought Final Fantasy VII was the first Final Fantasy game...  In which case... no.

Final Fantasy 1 was the game that saved the company.

While Dragon Quest was the game that made RPGs what they are today... made over at Enix.


 

Whoa whoa, slow down. What's the difference between Square and S-E?

Back in the day... up until about 2003.

Square and Enix were two different companies.

Around 2003, Square took a big hit and needed help... so they tried to merge with Enix.  Enix was hesistant to do it... since they were financially usntable... but went through with it after Sony stabalized Square by buying a bunch of stock and stablizing the company.

Enix was actually worth a bit more then Square at the time of merger.

The main differences before that were....

Square was like your average development company, except you know... abnormally talented.

They almost went out of buisness until FF1 saved them from bankrupcy, then they made a number of classics.

Enix worked differently, they were more a publishing company who owned IPS.  They'd take the best small developers they could find and get them to make games for them... and also publsih games made by developers that they thought would sell well.

Hence why games like Dragon Quest are still made by other developers.

Dragon Quest basically set down what JRPGs are.

Most things in JRPGs can still be traced back to Dragon Quest... or as we knew it Dragon Warrior.

Enix was kinda like Atlus... but bigger.  They also did other stuff... and still do.   Like publish Magna.  Popular US titles include Full Metal Alchemist and Soul Eater.

Of course this is overlooking numerous numberous awesome games Square made and Enix Published before their mergers... like the Ogre Battle series for one.



Just another thread about KH3 -____-

It will be on Wii.



vdoesntforgive said:

Nothing will give me more pleasure than to see Sora's chains moves realisticly in realtime, 1080p, 60fps all while looking like the greatest Pixar movie you'll ever see

 

 I got this far into your post and fell of my chair laughing.