By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General Discussion - rescuing someone from life or death can result in being sued...

Only in America.........

A court in the United States has ruled that a would-be Good Samaritan accused of rendering her friend paraplegic by pulling her from a wrecked car can be sued.

The Supreme Court of California has declared that the state's Good Samaritan law only protects people from liability if they are administering emergency medical care.

 

http://uk.news.yahoo.com/blog/editors_corner/article/9758/



Around the Network

wow thats pretty messed up, people are gonna be scared to leave their houses as if this carries on.



i dont think this will go so well...
last i checked if someone was in a life-threatening situation and you could act, but didnt, you could be held legally responsible. meaning the ruling would be incorrect.



"I like my steaks how i like my women.  Bloody and all over my face"

"Its like sex, but with a winner!"

MrBubbles Review Threads: Bill Gates, Jak II, Kingdom Hearts II, The Strangers, Sly 2, Crackdown, Zohan, Quarantine, Klungo Sssavesss Teh World, MS@E3'08, WATCHMEN(movie), Shadow of the Colossus, The Saboteur

That's awful.
(>'.')>



Wait so...i shouldnt save people from burning houses now then?



I hope my 360 doesn't RRoD
         "Suck my balls!" - Tag courtesy of Fkusmot

Around the Network
colonelstubbs said:
Wait so...i shouldnt save people from burning houses now then?

 

If you don't go and try to save them, you get sued. If you save them but they get hurt in the process, you get sued. If you save them perfectly, they will accuse you of causing the accident in the first place.

 

Pick one.




Flow -"The important is to pwn other ppl"

I've always been taught not to move anyone in a car wreck or someone who was badly injured until emergency personnel arrived for reasons such as this.

It may suck but her friend may not have been paraplegic if she wouldn't have removed them from the car. If her friend would have surely died if they remained in the car, then she did the right thing but that would be up to the paramedics to decide. I'm not saying I agree with the ruling but it is what it is.



Wetcoaster said:
I've always been taught not to move anyone in a car wreck or someone who was badly injured until emergency personnel arrived for reasons such as this.

It may suck but her friend may not have been paraplegic if she wouldn't have removed them from the car. If her friend would have surely died if they remained in the car, then she did the right thing but that would be up to the paramedics to decide. I'm not saying I agree with the ruling but it is what it is.

I don't know the entire situation, but what if it was about to catch fire. Sometimes I think civil suits are ridiculous.

 Yeah, I've also learned that you shouldn't pull someone from the car as well. It depends on the location of the car and if the car is beginning to smoke etc. You don't want the injured party to burn alive. This is total crap, because in California we are supposed to have a good samaritan law for this reason. I was watching my local news, and there was some guy in connecticut? or somewhere like that, and no one helped him after he was hit by a car and laying in the road. I love the United States' civil courts.



MrBubbles said:
i dont think this will go so well...
last i checked if someone was in a life-threatening situation and you could act, but didnt, you could be held legally responsible. meaning the ruling would be incorrect.

No, a person has no legal duty to render aid to others unless there is already a preexisting legal duty (such as a parent and a child, or a contractual duty like a lifeguard and a swimmer).

Bystanders have no duty to render aid.  There are a few states with good samaratian statutes which require you to render aid, but you only have to render aid if it isn't dangerous to do so, and you aren't expected to do something which you are physically incapable of doing.

And a good samaritan law usually only protects you if you aren't negligent.  If you negligently render aid and leave someone in a worse condition than they were before, you can be sued.

And just because she can be sued doesn't mean that the person suing her will win, or that the case won't be dismissed at a summary judgment level.



We had two bags of grass, seventy-five pellets of mescaline, five sheets of high-powered blotter acid, a salt shaker half full of cocaine, a whole galaxy of multi-colored uppers, downers, screamers, laughers…Also a quart of tequila, a quart of rum, a case of beer, a pint of raw ether and two dozen amyls.  The only thing that really worried me was the ether.  There is nothing in the world more helpless and irresponsible and depraved than a man in the depths of an ether binge. –Raoul Duke

It is hard to shed anything but crocodile tears over White House speechwriter Patrick Buchanan's tragic analysis of the Nixon debacle. "It's like Sisyphus," he said. "We rolled the rock all the way up the mountain...and it rolled right back down on us...."  Neither Sisyphus nor the commander of the Light Brigade nor Pat Buchanan had the time or any real inclination to question what they were doing...a martyr, to the bitter end, to a "flawed" cause and a narrow, atavistic concept of conservative politics that has done more damage to itself and the country in less than six years than its liberal enemies could have done in two or three decades. -Hunter S. Thompson

Well when I took my first aid course I was told that if the person is still conscious than you have to ask permission but if they are unconscious it is your choice and you cannot be sued for which ever decision you make.