Sorry man I told you so, I use to be like you.

Riiiiigghht. Every professional reviewer who has played metroid3 has said it looks WAY better in action than on any of the screenshots. In fact, IGN even went so far as to say the graphics are gorgeous.

"This level takes place after G.F.S. Olympus, as Samus is tasked with delivering a vaccine to the city's network to bring its Aurora Units back online. Not that we paid much attention to what we were supposed to be doing. Nope, we were stopping to stare, goggle-eyed, at our surroundings every time we turned a corner or stepped outside. This level is absolutely stunning; rich in atmosphere, with an incredible level of detail, both in the overall architecture and in individual surface textures. Even as you first disembark on the landing platform, a large beaked bird head wrought of iron surveys the scene from above the door, while great patterns are carved in the floor beneath your feet. The style of design is so strong and interesting - a wonderful mix of curved lines and soft green neon inside, bronze with rusted red towers outside - that within seconds you're viewing this seemingly ancient and arcane place with a sense of reverence. Ornate patterns adorn the walls, concentric arches rise up above doorways, corridors slink around corners, while walls curve away to the roof. It's gorgeous, and ably complemented by great use of lighting - luminous glowing green portals are set into the walls, giving interiors a soft, yet rich atmosphere, while tendrils of blue neon move along fine paths. Adding further to the atmosphere, a choir rises up when you step outside." IGN Wii

Now let's look at what they had to say about Killzone PS2:

"It's not uncommon to walk in front of a character and see a blurry mishmash of polygons that would barely pass as PSOne acceptable. It's not uncommon to turn a corner and see a hill that looks like a grey temporal void, or a floor that's a long sheet of pure brown. It's pretty ridiculous and happens way too much to be healthy. But what's more distracting is the way the animation routines seem to be tied into this same broken LOD system. When characters in the distance or as close as one foot away do anything they might only draw two or three frames of animation. It's like watching a Southpark character spontaneously move from one position to the next. Since the animation appears to be subject to the same popping whims as the models and textures, this can make for a laughable experience, especially since none of the routines (death scenes in particular) are very good. " IGN PS2

That's not to say that Killzone was a bad game or looked horrible, they did give it decent marks for graphics overall, just that your continuous bashing of the Wii is unmerited and not very well thought out.

Your Wii bashing is getting old.

Great, mine dies but this troll infested thread lives on, just when PS3owner and I were having so much fun aswell.

Even the title is throthing troll bait, but nope, apparenlty this ones acceptable.

Yeap, I know they pretty much looked the same, is just that it seems they took the Wii's screenshot with a camera cellphone. 

@ Leo

Are you actually a wii fan or is this a joke? Sorry for being off topic but I had to ask.

A great looking Wii game will look better than a crappy looking 360 or PS3 game....

Why is this debatable?

The point is Wii owners should stop trying to think that the Wii will have the best looking games versus the best looking of the other consoles, just realize one machine is weaker than both the others and that's why it's cheaper.

The less realistic a game looks on the Wii the more chance it has at competing with other non realistic looking games on the 360 and PS3. This is why Nintendo's games all don't look very realistic.

This is why Zelda should have kept the Windwaker look because that will hold better over time versus the pseudo realistic TP look which already looks old now.

The reason why Mario can look great even compared to 360/PS3 games? Because it's not trying to be realistic and thus it can stand on its own versus much stronger machines and more graphically powerful games.

Can we end this debate once and for all? There is a reason for how much consoles cost you know...

you cannot justify x360 graphics with games like godfather and CoD2 those games are ports and are also fetured on other systems.. makes since the graphics for those games nt tand up..

if you want to compare graphics compare new 360 only games to your unreleased wii games

Every "I think Wii graphics are more pleasing, therefore I like better" fanboy here is kidding themselves.

If Metroid and whatever Mario game would release on the PS3 or 360 it have more polygons, better lighting and faster framerate and it would be in HD!

Yeah, i mean really, the Wii may have better graphics then the PS3 or 360 on some games. But it's pretty much like how the Pirates on their best day could be the Red Sox on their worse day.

Wii will never have the best graphics, wii owners should just be happy with the advantages it does have instead of trying to be the best at everything.